2nd Release of Garrison Files:

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: kenmurray, dankbaar, Bob, Dealey Joe

2nd Release of Garrison Files:

Postby JDB4JFK » Tue Apr 02, 2019 9:16 pm

https://youtu.be/ZogK2IIiomg

I thought Ruth Paine's maiden name was Hyde, but you got to admit that's close too Hidell.
JDB4JFK
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:32 am

Re: 2nd Release of Garrison Files:

Postby JDThomas » Thu Apr 18, 2019 12:39 pm

I am amazed that John Barbour's release of the lost Garrison Files is not getting more discussion here. There is an awful lot of detail here that has not come to light previously and helps fill in some gaps.

http://www.johnbarboursworld.com/the-garrison-files/
User avatar
JDThomas
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: 2nd Release of Garrison Files:

Postby bobspez » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:44 am

Can you give us a few examples of what you found most interesting?
JDThomas wrote:... There is an awful lot of detail here that has not come to light previously and helps fill in some gaps.

http://www.johnbarboursworld.com/the-garrison-files/
bobspez
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:00 pm

Re: 2nd Release of Garrison Files:

Postby JDThomas » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:58 am

Well in the first document, we see good detail about the company Freeport Sulfur. Previously there has been alot of suspicion about this company, but here, it is spelled-out that it is indeed a CIA front. It has a subsidary - Freeport Nickel fronted by one Clay Shaw (Bertrand) which owns assets in Cuba. Castro confiscates these Cuban assets - Freeport and Clay Shaw (and CIA) are out of pocket to the tune of over $1million (around $8.5 in todays money). JFK orders CIA to close-down anti-castro operations - Freeport-Shaw-CIA will not be getting their money back - how does this make them feel?
Evidence also indicates that Shaw is piloted on flights concerning Freeport (CIA) business by a man named David Ferrie.
The use of library cards is also interesting, but you have to join the dots up on that yourself!

What John Barbour makes clear is that Garrison had considerably more evidence in his posession than he used in the Shaw trial. This was his backstop to use in the perjury trial if Shaw was found not guilty first time around. The Justice Dept. prevented the perjury trial going ahead and Harry Connick Sr. ordering the destruction of these documents was meant to bury the remaining evidence.

I think that this is a reasonable start!
User avatar
JDThomas
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: United Kingdom


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests