James Files in the Moorman photo

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: kenmurray, dankbaar, Bob, Dealey Joe

Postby Jim Thompson » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:14 pm

dankbaar wrote:http://jfkmurdersolved.com/epstein.htm


Epstein is CIA and "damage control". AND a grand LIAR, who is never available for comment.

Wim


It would be interesting to refute & expose Epstein & validate Vernon & Jimmy.

"The final WRITTEN opinion from the Kroll Agency was that Kroll found “NO OTHER PLACEâ€
Jim Thompson
 

JIM THOMPSON, THANK YOU FOR THE PLUG:

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:32 pm

Dear Mr. Jim Thompson,

I have just reviewed your email. Thank You for the "plug."

Anyway, Jim - people who know me, and Jimmy, and about our long term friendship, including Wim Dankbaar, and Lieutenant Colonel Dangerous Dan Marvin, often ask me this question, in various forms:

"Bruce, it's obvious that you and Jimmy go back a long, long way, and have a tremendous bond. If you did not know Jimmy, and if you did not know everything that you know, what one simple fact stands out in your mind about 'making you believe Jimmy Sutton (Files),' as if you just met him today ?"

My answer has always been the shell casing from The Remington Fireball
XP - 100. And there are two factors.

1. Jimmy totally described the most unusual gun, and ammunition, ever used by the CIA, obviously not a lucky guess. And this gun is unknown to many serious gun experts that I have personally questioned.

2. Once the shell was found, years later, nobody ever knew that there were marks, not merely a dent, in the shell casing. Jimmy described his
teethmarks, which teeth, etc. I can not even calculate the odds on a "lucky guess" on this fact, let alone both of them together.

Anyway, if I just bought Wim's DVD and Book today, and knew nothing about Jimmy Sutton (Files), the shell casing, and Jimmy accurately describing his teeth marks, those two facts alone would really blow me away.

Jim Thompson, please let me know what you think.

Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 

Playing the Devil's Advocate

Postby Jim Thompson » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:02 pm

Bruce Patrick Brychek wrote:1. Jimmy totally described the most unusual gun, and ammunition, ever used by the CIA, obviously not a lucky guess. And this gun is unknown to many serious gun experts that I have personally questioned.

2. Once the shell was found, years later, nobody ever knew that there were marks, not merely a dent, in the shell casing. Jimmy described his
teethmarks, which teeth, etc. I can not even calculate the odds on a "lucky guess" on this fact, let alone both of them together.


Quibble:

(2) John R. Stockwell published his critique of the James Files Story on 23rd January, 1997.

A colorful part of his story is how he fired one shot with his Fireball, took the cartridge out, bit down on it, and then left it on the fence railing. There are several unresolved problems with this. First, John Rademacher found 2 Fireball cartridges, not just one. Second, Files did apparently own a Fireball.... but the serial numbers clearly indicated that it's manufacture substantially post-dated the assassination. And finally, Joe West was conferring closely with Rademacher a year before he discovered and met Files. He and I had talked about the practicality of using a Fireball for a shot from the fence (first postulated by Josiah Thompson). Joe had photographs of the dented cartridge when he went to visit Files in prison.



What's the story on this Stockwell quibble?... Anyway, I've got a question: instead of mercury, why not water, which would not have left a mercury residue?

Jim
Jim Thompson
 

JIM THOMPSON ON THE FIREBALL:

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:12 pm

Dear Mr. Jim Thompson,

The batch of 500 Remington Fireballs that went to the CIA did not have
their serial numbers recorded publically. Further, please explain, or have anyone on the planet earth explain how they got any serial number from any gun that Jimmy had at any time from the CIA , and David Atlee Phillips ?

I know for a fact that they did not, could not, and are lying if they claim they did/do.

Additionally, I am aware of "many calling cards that Jimmy" left, and his teeth marks on this cartridge were not the first calling card, nor the last.

Additionally, Jimmy told Joe West to have the cartridge tested for his teeth marks. Wim and I actually have copies of the Official Report that states that the marks are in fact teeth marks. Also, I am better aware of how this unfolded chronologically than any sources that I have read, heard of, or that you site here.

Finally, I was aware of all of this long before I ever heard of Joe West.

As far as Mercury Tips, that was the method taught to Wolfman and Jimmy by the CIA. Mercury does not readily evaporate at the high temperatures like water does. Further, there was no reason to cover-up that Mercury Tips were used.

If these sources you sited claim to know about Jimmy's Remington Fireball XP - 100, then please have them tell you or me about unusual markings on the gun ? They can not, will not, and are unable to, and are therefore lying. I defy them to prove me wrong.

Further, Jimmy NEVER owned a Remington Fireball XP - 100. Another lie,
or piece of disinformation. I defy them to state a verifiable source.

Why did JFK'S brain disappear ? No testing can be done to confirm Mercury.

Why was Joe West "killed" when his federal Lawsuit to exhume JFK'S casket was close to being granted ? (Notice I said exhume the casket, not JKF'S body, as I also strongly believe that JFK was burried at sea, as was JFK, JR., and his wife). JFK'S body had to disappear for numerous reasons.

Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 

Re: JIM THOMPSON ON THE FIREBALL:

Postby Paul » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:54 am

Bruce Patrick Brychek wrote:Dear Mr. Jim Thompson,
Additionally, Jimmy told Joe West to have the cartridge tested for his teeth marks. Wim and I actually have copies of the Official Report that states that the marks are in fact teeth marks. Also, I am better aware of how this unfolded chronologically than any sources that I have read, heard of, or that you site here.
Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.


Dear Mr. Bruce Patrick Brychek,

I won't get in discussion with you about the teethmarks, I know the document, but wasn't it so that the doctor later said something else and wasn't that sure and that he always has said it could have been teethmarks in stead of that they were?

Something else:
I believe indeed that the marks on the shellcasing are indeed teethmarks, Wim showed me the casing at his house and also the testcasings that he has bitten and he showed me, so I'm fully convinced that the marks were teethmarks.
I'm also convinced that it all could have been done:
-shellcasing isn't that warm (Mark tested that)
-no recoil of the Remington Fireball XP-100
-enough time to switch jacket inside out
-placing the bullet which is small (I've seen the real one and holded it in my hand!!!) and place it on the fence is a very tough job, but not impossible...
But what I'm still wondering is this:

This all is still NO proof that it was indeed Files who did this all!
Where is the hard proof that all this was done by Files and NOT by some one else???
Files was chosen by Nicoletti because of his excellent driving isn't it?
And he was chosen to be the driver of the getaway car isn't it?
Why the hell must he do the shooting then and also on a place the most far away of that getaway car? And fired the latest shot? When I was a hitman in the Daltex and I knew my driver of the car was still some where on the Grassy Knoll I was NOT be waiting in the car after all what happened overthere at that time at that place!
So, what is real hard proof that it was indeed Files on the Grassy Knoll and that it was indeed Files who fired the last fatal headshot and that it was Files who bit the shellcasing and NOT some one else like Nicoletti, Roselli or Caifano?
Isn't it convenient that they are all dead now?
And isn't it also strange that THEY are all dead/murdered and Files is still alive? Didn't they want the real shooter of JFK also murdered? And don't come up with "they tried", because if they really want to they try it over and over again till finally get their mission!
Isn't it more plausible that Files was all the time in the getaway car and that he heard the story of the real shooter?

Respectfully,

Paul.
Paul
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:55 am

Postby dankbaar » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:20 am

(2) John R. Stockwell published his critique of the James Files Story on 23rd January, 1997.

A colorful part of his story is how he fired one shot with his Fireball, took the cartridge out, bit down on it, and then left it on the fence railing. There are several unresolved problems with this. First, John Rademacher found 2 Fireball cartridges, not just one. Second, Files did apparently own a Fireball.... but the serial numbers clearly indicated that it's manufacture substantially post-dated the assassination. And finally, Joe West was conferring closely with Rademacher a year before he discovered and met Files. He and I had talked about the practicality of using a Fireball for a shot from the fence (first postulated by Josiah Thompson). Joe had photographs of the dented cartridge when he went to visit Files in prison.

-----------------------------


Jim,

Let's say I say you are a child molestor......... You know it's a lie. I know it's a lie. But what does it do with you? First of all you won't like the accusation, secondly you will feel an urge to debunk and disprove the accusation. Thirdly, that will put you in defense mode. And whatever you will say, it will be difficult to disprove it. Some people may even believe that smoke originates from fire. You see? That's how disinformation works!


It is a shame that no matter what lies someone puts out, some of the mud will stick and you'll find yourself wasting time on debunking the lies.

Joe West never brought pictures of the shell casings to James Files. It's a lie. But even if Joe did, it does not change anything because nobody knew there was a human teethmark on one of them.... until James Files said so. The teethmark was confirmed to be a teethmark AFTER Files said so.

Secondly, I have BOTH the shell casings and they do NOT have serial numbers on them. Another lie.

Thirdly, there is NO problem with the fact that TWO shell casings were found on Dealey Plaza. Jimmy does simply not have an explanation for the other one. Only for HIS one. Which in fact makes his veracity stronger, for if he were a hoax he would have "concocted" an explanation for TWO casings, not one.


Fourthly, Josiah Thompson never mentioned a Remington Fireball XP-100. He theorised that the grassy knoll shot may have come from a "long barreled pistol". This was in 1967 in a Time article !!


CIA assets like Stockwell and Epstein want to allege a conspiracy in the "creation" of the Files story, bigger than the JFK conspiracy itself, with numerous people involved (West, Rademacher, Vernon, Shelton, Dankbaar, etc).

Fifthly, they are never available for comments. Stockwell has dissapeared and Epstein was called just 2 months ago by the people making the Dutch program on James Files. After all, they are good journalists adhering to the principle to investigate the "other side". So Epstein was given an opportunity to spew his comments. I had been so helpful to give them Epstein's telephone number. The conversation was very short: "Is this about Files? I don't want to talk about it." Click - beep beep.

Why does the James Files story produce such an emotional non-response from Epstein? Why, if in fact he "disproved" the Files confession? Why does he avoid comments if it were so easy to prove his claims? Or is he afraid his lies will be exposed?

Let me tell you something else about the honorable professor. Not only was he the last man to interview George Demohrenschildt one day before George committed "suicide", and one day before Demohrenschildt was located by the House Select Comittee for questioning. How did Epstein know this? With no visible connection to the HSCA?

Not only was he the man who killed the NBC program on James Files in 1995, but also was he the reporter (whose name was redacted) in the 1977 letter of Billy Joe Lord to president Jimmy Carter.

He was the reporter who harrassed and urged Lord, former shipmate of Lee Harvey Oswald, to tell him what he knew about Oswald. And if Lord would not, then pressure of higher people, like George Bush junior, would be applied! That reporter was J. Edward Epstein, and it led to an official FBI complaint from Lord against Epstein. Again, Epstein's name is redacted out in that complaint. This information is virtually unknown among JFK researchers.

What does Epstein have to do with people that knew Lee Harvey Oswald at the exact same time that the HSCA is trying to find them? How does Epstein know this? And how is he able to beat the HSCA in locating them?

The implication is clear: Epstein is CIA, disinfo and damage control.

Wim


PS: The letter of Lord can be found here:

http://jfkmurdersolved.com/bush3.htm


http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/pageONE.jpg

http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/pageTWO.jpg

http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/pageTHREE.jpg


George W. Bush does not want to talk about the issues set out in the next few paragraphs. Why he was working with Lee Harvey Oswald's roommate Billy Joe Lord at the same company. Lord was threaten by Edward Jay Epstein and his writers said that if he didn't cooperate they would go to his boss George W. Bush, Epstein was the last person to interview de Mohrenschildt before he committed suicide. Bush's cousins, the Walker's have been one of the largest Wall Street securities firms since the beginning of the 1900s. Which gives new meaning to the T.V. series Texas Walker Ranger.

GEORGE BUSH JR. indirectly in 1976 employed Billy Joe Lord, who was Lee Harvey Oswald's roommate on the ship in 1959 when Oswald defected to the Soviet Union. Lord filed an affidavit with the FBI against Edward Jay Epstein the last person to interview de Mohrenschildt. Epstein's writers threaten Lord to go to his employer, George Bush Jr. hinting that his father was CIA Director. Epstein's good friend is Bill Clinton's personal adviser, Sidney Bluemthal. (See Astrix * for more on Billy Joe Lord).

For FBI document filed March 15,1977, two weeks before Readers Digest's writer Edward Jay Epstein visited George de Mohrenschildt. This document ties both George W. Bush and his father to de Mohrenschildt's suicide and ties Jr. to Oswald's 1959 roommate Billy Joe Lord when Oswald defected to Soviet Union. Click here for FBI complaint against Edward Jay Epstein, page one.

Click here for FBI complaint against Edward Jay Epstein, page two last person to meet with de Mohrenschildt.

Click here for FBI complaint by Billy Joe Lord against Edward Jay Epstein and Henry Hurt, page three last person to meet with de Mohrenschildt.


Source: http://ciajfk.com/home4.html




PS2: Paul, Bruce is mentioned in the introduction of my book, and I have many letters were James Files writes about Bruce, wherein he confirms that Bruce is his best living friend. They are just not in the book. Jimmy and Bruce know each other since 1968 from Martial Arts school. I am sure Bruce is going to comment further to you, but Bruce is convinced as Jimmy, that the government will never put him on trial for JFK, for all their own involvement would come out. Epstein's interference should already give you that hint.


As to your alleged "plausibilities": Yes it is possible that 21 year old Files was in the getaway car and heard the story of the real shooter.
Anything is possible. BTW, this possibility would still make him an insider. But who was the real shooter then? Do you think a Nicoletti or Roselli or any other professional shooter would have left his bitten shell casing there? And why would Files want to take credit for that shot, if it incriminates himself and if he can blame the "real shooter"?

Also, Nicoletti did not expect James to take a shot. He relied on his own shooting skills. So in his expectation Files would just have been a bystander like all the others on the plaza. There would have been no problem to return quickly to the car, and in hindsight there wasn't even a problem in the scenario that Files took the shot.

As for the killings you need to distinguish between two circumstances. Nicoletti, Roselli, Giancana, Demohrenschildt, Ferrie, etc were ALL sought for questioning. They were PUBLIC suspects. Files never was. Nobody really knew about his role. He was not a risk like the others.

It's a myth that all involved were all killed. What about Posada, Bosch, Echevarria, Guillermo Novo, Frank Sturgis, Pedro Diaz Lanz, Howard Hunt? Were they all killed?

Wim
User avatar
dankbaar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1472
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:27 pm

Postby Paul » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:36 am

Wim,

Nice copy and paste: almost the same long answer as in the other topic "a good friend..."
I also knew this answer and it is still no proof that Files was indeed THE shooter, true?
Wim, I don't want to discredit Files with his story/statement, because I still believe him, but I want the real hard proof, the hard evidence that he did it!

Gr. Paul.
Paul
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:55 am

Postby dankbaar » Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:30 pm

Well, You are not going to get a picture of James firing the shot from the knoll, unless Beverly Oliver's film resurfaces one day.

I think that so far the hardest proof is the shell casing. Can you explain to me, I mean really explain, how Files could have known there was a teethmark on that casing?

Wim


PS: And don't forget the simple fact that Lee Harvey Oswald fiercely denied all charges, and that James Files confessed to the crime. Yet, officially LHO is still the killer. In a normal murder case, a confession is usually enough to solve the case. But I guess you had already figured out that this is not a normal murder case :lol:


Wim
User avatar
dankbaar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1472
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:27 pm

THE BOOK

Postby Jim Thompson » Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:50 pm

dankbaar wrote:But I guess you had already figured out that this is not a normal murder case :lol:


Wim


Good point. It looks very much the case that all of these lingering doubts & suspicions, which may or may not be the work of CIA spin meisters & disinformation mavens, must be dispelled by Bruce's book in progress. Until that book is out the chaos will remain.

For example, if the:

"The final WRITTEN opinion from the Kroll Agency was that Kroll found “NO OTHER PLACEâ€
Jim Thompson
 

Postby francois bertrand » Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:52 pm

i have always these questions in my head and
it drive me a little bit crasy...

a) Nicoletti say ok to James Files to back him,
but JF is at the grassy knoll, in front of
the motorcade. Wim gave an explanation to that.

b) Files is Nicoletti's driver.... Nicoletti shot from
the Daltex building, then wait in the car for JF ?

c) James Files, 21 years old gave shooting lessons to
Nicoletti, a first class killer...

d) november 22, 10:30... they decided at this moment
that Daltex Building is a good place for Nicoletti to shot..
2 hours before the motorcade... pro killers... Very simple to enter into
a building with a rifle, look for a good spot to shoot,
and without anybody notice you or hear you. Anybody do that. For me, this is the main point to be clear up.
François
User avatar
francois bertrand
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Québec Canada

Postby francois bertrand » Mon May 01, 2006 4:26 pm

question...

the magic bullet... has been found at the hospital.... as seen in JFK movie, this bullet has been put there...

so the question is: why ? why put a bullet there ? for what reason ?
François
User avatar
francois bertrand
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Québec Canada

Postby Bob » Mon May 01, 2006 4:37 pm

The bullet was placed there to trace back to Oswald's rifle. But the placement of the bullet backfired (no pun intended). First, it was in pristine condition. Secondly, there were more fragments of a bullet in Connally's wrist then were missing from the pristine bullet. Then you also have the crazy path of this "magic" bullet.
Last edited by Bob on Mon May 01, 2006 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bob
 
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Florida/Wisconsin

Postby francois bertrand » Mon May 01, 2006 4:43 pm

yep... it's make sense....
François
User avatar
francois bertrand
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Québec Canada

Postby Tommy Bullgotti » Mon May 01, 2006 8:53 pm

So you guys don't believe that the image from the link I presented shows the head of the true shooter(Files)?
"The people had , that had so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."-----

Jack Ruby
Tommy Bullgotti
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:58 am
Location: United States

Postby francois bertrand » Wed May 03, 2006 12:12 pm

Files wasn't dressed in police uniform....
François
User avatar
francois bertrand
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Québec Canada

PreviousNext

Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bruce Patrick Brychek and 6 guests