The Records Building Shooter

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: kenmurray, dankbaar, Bob, Dealey Joe

The Records Building Shooter

Postby John Bruno » Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:36 pm

I need information! Was there really a shooter firing from the rooftop of the Dallas County Records building? What about the rusted shell discovered on the roof in the '70s? Why are there no photographs of this shell? This just frustrates me.

The misses(Give me info! Photos! anything!):

*The road sign
*The curb on the north side of Elm Street
*The floorpan of the limousine
*The manhole cover on Elm Street(??) :?

Confirmed misses:

*The street(first shot, Z155)
*Main Street curb/James Tague(occured at Z285)
*The limousine's roof frame/windshield(Caused by fragments from the headshots)
"The truth shall make you free"
John Bruno
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:16 am

Postby Tommy Bullgotti » Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:22 am

Well, there are some strong suspects. Like Mr. Gerry Patrick Hemming. He I believe was a self proclaimed shooter. Another suspect is "Saul" who was given that name by Hugh McDonald(See "Appointment in Dallas").

Saul has a very interesting story. It is claimed by Mr. Hugh McDonald that "Saul" was the fake Oswald in Mexico, captured on film by the Soviet Embassy camera(See W.C. Exhibits).

Now, it could go both ways... but if I were to say who I would think was the most prime suspect, I'd go with "Saul".

However, according to the "Saul" story, Oswald was fireing diversionary shots from the 6th floor window. Based on ballistics, we know this cannot be true, and at least 1 shot had to of come from the TSBD Snipers nest that actually hit an occupant of the limo. The myserious Saul also claims that he was to kill Lee Oswald right when the shooting was done, but Oswald stepped back into the shadows, and escaped.

As fare as the shell is concerned, I believe there is a photo of it. I will try and see what I can dig up, and I'll get back to you.


The roadsign hit has always been a theory. But according to Jim Marrs, he has seen and original "Garrison copy" of the Zapruder film. A first edition, without the splice at 208. He claims that it clearly shows a missed shot hitting the Stemmons Freeway sign. He then went on to say that the sign was removed early in 1964 by unknown peoples. The highway group claims it wasnt them. The Dallas road service claim it wasn't them. Nobody is talkin about it. But it did dissappear. He claims that it was clear as day that a bullet struck the sign.

I would be already to believe Mr. Marrs. However, I find it kind of hard to believe that someone would miss so far off. I mean lets speculate... to hit the sign from the TSBD Oswald Window, you'd have to miss by a longshot. To miss by the Dal-Tex building you'd have to miss by a longshot. To hit it from the Grassy Knoll fence, you'd have to miss quite a bit. To be a Records building sniper, you'd have to miss by a longshot.

I'm not so sure where this bullet hole could of been caused... Possibly the West window of the TSBD... that is, if it is true.

Elm st. miss....

If you have an good ol copy of "Rush to Judgement", Mark Lane cites a few witnesses who believed a shot had hit Elm St. I cannot remember the specifics, but I believe there even was an officer who claimed to of seen it. When he went to investigate weeks later, the miss had been filled in, and not a trace was left except for brand new concrete. I fully believe the witnesses to be credible, and feel that this is a for sure miss.

The floorpan is a mystery to me. A few people on this board could possibly know more than me. I believe I have heard Mark mention it before. He may have info on it. Or even Wim.

The manhole cover.... Well, it could have been caused by a missed shot. But I don't know of many witnesses who saw such a thing, nor any investigator on site that actually believed it to be a miss. I know there is a photograph of the manhole cover being looked at and gthere is indeed a dent or knotch in it, but I believe it would be impossible to confirm it as a miss. However, it cannot be ruled out, simply because it does indeed have an appearance of a possible knick from a bullet or fragment.

http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/DPlaza/plaza3.gif

Lancer had this labeled as "Manhole cover", but I still think it is difficult to say. They maybe looking for skull fragments, or bullet fragments.


That's about all I can say about everything... I will try and look up some more, but I doubt I could say anything else.

I haven't completely rules all these missed and such out. I just am still at a mindset of disbelief, and doubt of everything. From both the LNer's side and CTer's. I don't trust much anything anymore. Disinfo is spread by both parties. I onlybelieve what I wish, and that's all any of us can do in a case like this.
"The people had , that had so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."-----

Jack Ruby
Tommy Bullgotti
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:58 am
Location: United States

Re: The Records Building Shooter

Postby Jorgen Sjolen » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:24 am

John Bruno wrote:I need information! Was there really a shooter firing from the rooftop of the Dallas County Records building? What about the rusted shell discovered on the roof in the '70s? Why are there no photographs of this shell? This just frustrates me.

The misses(Give me info! Photos! anything!):

*The road sign
*The curb on the north side of Elm Street
*The floorpan of the limousine
*The manhole cover on Elm Street(??) :?

Confirmed misses:

*The street(first shot, Z155)
*Main Street curb/James Tague(occured at Z285)
*The limousine's roof frame/windshield(Caused by fragments from the
headshots)


Don´t know if this answers your question but i found this
http://www.strike-the-root.com/51/herman/herman16.html
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/curb.jpg
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/tague1.gif
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/tague2.gif
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/tague3.gif
Jorgen Sjolen
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Sollefteå | Sweden

Postby John Bruno » Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:21 am

Thanks for the information Tommy.

I don't believe anything I read off of the John Mcadams website. Don't you guys know he's CIA?
"The truth shall make you free"
John Bruno
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:16 am

Postby Jorgen Sjolen » Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:40 am

John Bruno wrote:Thanks for the information Tommy.

I don't believe anything I read off of the John Mcadams website. Don't you guys know he's CIA?



And?
Jorgen Sjolen
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Sollefteå | Sweden

Postby Timothy Franzen » Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:59 pm

And, The CIA can't be trusted for reliable information. They've got the shots coming from the TSBD. Give me a Break!!!! :roll:
Timothy Franzen
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:15 pm

Postby Jorgen Sjolen » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:29 pm

Timothy Franzen wrote:And, The CIA can't be trusted for reliable information. They've got the shots coming from the TSBD. Give me a Break!!!! :roll:


I can agree that the page is disinforming , but it is just showing the version relased by warren comminson

according to you , as i see it , when i read your post , is that the entire CIA was involved and everyone in CIA knows whats happend and is a part of the cover up ?

Please
Give me a break
Jorgen Sjolen
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Sollefteå | Sweden

Postby John Bruno » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:50 pm

Give me a break
Give me a break
Give me a break of that Kit-Kat bar


:lol:

The CIA knows about the cover-up because they were involved.
Last edited by John Bruno on Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The truth shall make you free"
John Bruno
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:16 am

Postby Jorgen Sjolen » Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:54 pm

John Bruno wrote:Give me a break
Give me a break
Give me a break of that Kit-Kat bar


:lol:

The CIA knows about the cover-up.


Don´t think the entire CIA knows about it , that would be a very stupid thing
Jorgen Sjolen
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Sollefteå | Sweden

Postby John Bruno » Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:00 pm

Everyone was involved!

1. The Mafia(Chicago and New Orleans)
2. The CIA
3. The FBI
4. Anti-Castro Cubans
5. Richard Nixon(Where the hell was he on 11/22/63?)
6. Lyndon B. Johnson(Suspect)
7. The Dallas Police
8. The Secret Service
9. Life Magazine
10. The Warren Commission
11. The Government
12. The Bushes
etc, etc, etc. I believe everyone was involved. This is the reason why the truth has been cover-up so long.
"The truth shall make you free"
John Bruno
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:16 am

Postby Bob » Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:08 pm

The CIA is all Bu$H. It always has been. Allen Dulles, who ran the CIA, was one of Prescott Bu$h's best friends. Prescott Bu$h was very powerful back then. He helped persuade Ike to run for President and he also set up Ike with his political protege (puppet) Tricky Dick Nixon as VP. Another Dulles, John Foster, was Ike's Secretary of State. Bu$h was not only very powerful in the intelligence and political communities, he also had a large stake in Wall Street and in the media. He was a founder of CBS. His good buddy Allen Dulles brought George H.W. Bu$h into the CIA in the late 50's. We all know about his role in the Bay of Pigs and the JFK assassination. Then another Prescott Bu$h puppet ( Gerald Ford) names Poppy CIA director after pardoning Nixon over Watergate. Poppy refuses to cooperate with HSCA over the JFK, RFK and MLK assasinations. Why? Because all roads led to the CIA and Poppy Bu$h. The CIA is still controlled by the Bu$hes. Porter Goss is just another Bu$h puppet. Poppy still looks at the CIA briefs everyday.
User avatar
Bob
 
Posts: 4991
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Florida/Wisconsin

Postby Jorgen Sjolen » Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:20 pm

John Bruno wrote:Everyone was involved!

1. The Mafia(Chicago and New Orleans)
2. The CIA
3. The FBI
4. Anti-Castro Cubans
5. Richard Nixon(Where the hell was he on 11/22/63?)
6. Lyndon B. Johnson(Suspect)
7. The Dallas Police
8. The Secret Service
9. Life Magazine
10. The Warren Commission
11. The Government
12. The Bushes
etc, etc, etc. I believe everyone was involved. This is the reason why the truth has been cover-up so long.


I must admit that the evidence looks like that everyone was in on the murder of JFK.

But how have this been keept quiet if so much people was involved ?

My theroie is that only a couple from CIA knew about the plans , maybe even the CIA cheif recruited the killers from outside the agency
There is no way this much people could have hold their silence , if you can give me a good reason for that i am willing to belive , and no , that everyone that talked was killed is not an evidence
:P
Jorgen Sjolen
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Sollefteå | Sweden

Re: The Records Building Shooter

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:06 am

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Readers and Researchers:

What is the latest documented information on this ?

Are there any current developments or effort by anybody, anywhere ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: The Records Building Shooter

Postby Dealey Joe » Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:21 pm

I think there were two parts of the assassination,
1. The plan to murder
2. the plan to cover it up

Cia was probably controlled by Bush people, FBI by Hoover. DPD by Decker.

most if not all were at the party Thursday eve. at Murchison.

The cover up took much more planning and people in key places.

I see the Murchison Party was the final planning for the cover, to be sure everything was in place.

Everything led back to Texas with all the money and power brokers, Military contractors, John Connally was representative for big money interests,
LBJ from the Political interests, Bush, Hoover and Decker on the Cover up.

The Bottlers Convention had to be a cover for people being in Dallas?
Proverbs 8:36 ...; All those who hate me love death.” Phil Robertson on ISIS
User avatar
Dealey Joe
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:45 am


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron