"KILLING PART OF NEW U.S. STRATEGY TO DETER FOES:"

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: Bob, Phil Dragoo, Dealey Joe, kenmurray, dankbaar

"KILLING PART OF NEW U.S. STRATEGY TO DETER FOES:"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Sun Feb 02, 2020 1:05 am

Saturday
02.01.2020
7:05 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY:

Since Cain killed Abel in the Garden of Eden, killing has always been the perfect way to remove the
competition-opposition.

Dead men tell no details.

"We the People..." are still searching for, and awaiting for answers, relative to The Removals of JFK,
MX, MLK, and RFK. And they're all still dead. It last a very long time.

Killing works if properly done. Ask the Clinton's.

Regime Changes the World Over has worked for the U.S. Government through the CIA, Delta Force,
and so many other Black-Covert Ops that "We the People..." don't ever know about.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.


Pompeo says Soleimani killing part of new strategy to deter U.S. foes
January 13, 2020, 5:22 PM CST

U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo arrives to brief members of the U.S. Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington
By Humeyra Pamuk and Jonathan Landay

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday said Qassem Soleimani was
killed as part of a broader strategy of deterring challenges by U.S. foes that also applies to China and Russia,
further diluting the assertion that the top Iranian general was struck because he was plotting imminent attacks
on U.S. targets.

In his speech at Stanford University's Hoover Institute, Pompeo made no mention of the threat of imminent
attacks planned by Soleimani. It only was in response to a question that he repeated his earlier assertion
that pre-empting such plots was the reason for the Jan. 3 American drone strike on Iran's second most
powerful official.

His speech, "The Restoration of Deterrence: The Iranian Example," focused on what he called an administration
strategy to establish "real deterrence" against Iran following earlier Republican and Democratic policies that
encouraged Tehran's "malign activity."

Democratic and some Republican lawmakers have challenged the administration over the self-defense rationale
supported by undisclosed intelligence over imminent attacks. U.S. President Donald Trump has said the potential
targets included four U.S. embassies.

On Sunday, Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he had seen no intelligence forewarning of imminent attacks on
embassies.

Trump on Monday added new fuel to the controversy by saying "it really doesn't matter" whether Soleimani posed
an imminent threat.

Pompeo said there was "a bigger strategy" behind the killing of Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force,
Iran's elite foreign espionage and paramilitary force.

"President Trump and those of us in his national security team are re-establishing deterrence – real deterrence ‒
against the Islamic Republic of Iran," he said.

"Your adversary must understand not only that you have the capacity to impose cost but that you're in fact willing
to do so," Pompeo said, adding that the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal from which Trump withdrew in 2018 had
emboldened Tehran.

"America now enjoys the greatest position of strength regarding Iran we've ever been in," he said, pointing to the
damage done to the Iranian economy by U.S. sanctions that Trump re-imposed following his withdrawal from the
nuclear deal.

"The importance of deterrence isn't confined to Iran," Pompeo said. "In all cases, we must deter foes to defend
freedom. That's the whole point of President Trump's work to make our military the strongest it's ever been."

He cited the resumption of lethal military aid to Ukraine for defense against Russia-backed separatists, Trump's
withdrawal from an arms control accord with Moscow and tests of a new U.S. intermediate-range cruise missile.

Pompeo also pointed to increased U.S. naval exercises in the South China Sea in response to China's militarization
of disputed islands and Trump's imposition of tariffs on Chinese imports as aspects of the administration's deterrence
strategy.

"We're restoring credibility to deterrence," he said.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: "KILLING PART OF NEW U.S. STRATEGY TO DETER FOES:"

Postby Phil Dragoo » Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:59 pm

Bob Baer 21-year CIA case officer was in pursuit of the mastermind of the 1983 Beirut Embassy bombing which killed 60.

He was arrested by two FBI agents sent by Clinton national security advisor Tony Lake on a charge of plotting to assassinate Saddam Hussein.

This anecdote begins Baer's See No Evil--and is a demonstration of the preposterous nature of the bodacious nonsense official deep state mythologists typically dole out to a mass of P.T. Barnum carnival suckers.

Baer says the perp was Hamas/Hezbollah/term of art for Iran--where the head pedophile misogynist believes in a hidden imam and that the sight of a woman's uncovered hair drives men mad.

Where homosexuals are thrown from roofs--yet Mayor Pete the baby-killer finds more fault with the president who greenlighted the hit on the Guard gestapo chief.

As Dr. Lipsky told us fifty years ago international relations rely on a concept of limits--those who perpetrate terror attacks know no such limit.

Observe the fate of the witnesses to the JFK assassination--David Ferrie, for example. The shot that changed the mind of the Tippit witness--ask Veciana--a shot to the head will clarify the memory.

Obama gave them pallets of cash, billions of our dollars--It failed to deter their centrifuge production of enriched uranium, nor their bombings and rocket attacks.

A bouncer must bounce--the door must be respected.

Do the cartels control the politicians? How many tens of thousands are murdered or made to disappear south of a border one party does not recognize?

How can a party which kills tens of millions of small humans object to our terminating the Guard oberfuhrer of terror?

We formed the Marines to stop the Muslim piracy and murder.

Yet Brennan stipulated jihad is a legitimate religious tenet.

So he would approve of Fort Hood mass killer Hasan Nidal--but not of taking out the Guard leader--

Without a border and law and order there is no we--

Our system of elections, representative government, peaceful transition of power, open discussion of current events depends upon a constitution with its integrated Bill of Rights--

Let us as JFK said never fear to negotiate--

--but let the evil not mistake us for sheep.

The peace plan was rejected--because the other party desires to kill every Jew

Its Grand Mufti of Jerusalem is seen in photos conversing with Hitler and Himmler

A concept of limits--

--or else be ready for the United States to establish same by the means necessary.

We are dealing with a number of totalitarian players out of an Orwellian dystopia:

An Islamist fanaticism which demands convert or be killed

A Chinese Communist resurgence which represses Muslims and censors its citizens' news and views

A Russian Federation which actively eliminates political opposition

To continue our exceptional experiment in freedom it is necessary to stop that element at the door

Now comes the Sanders mob suffering repression from the factors which control the DNC

Threatening violence--

Does no one know how Hitler and Stalin contended in the streets of Berlin--how each eliminated opposition by mass murder

A concept of limits--sometimes must be demonstrated--when its mere abstract mention is insufficient to deter the beast
User avatar
Phil Dragoo
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:09 am

Re: "KILLING PART OF NEW U.S. STRATEGY TO DETER FOES:"

Postby bobspez » Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:56 am

So what happened to one nation under God? Murder is still murder. Is the mentality that killed Bin Laden and Solemani any different than the mentality that killed JFK? The rhetoric of God is on our side and we are the good killing the evil is repeated by both sides of every conflict. In the end it is wholesale murder. It doesn't pan out so well for anyone. Prescot Bush and Harriman financed Hitler and put him in power to overturn socialism in Germany. We financed Bin Laden in Afghanistan as a cold war proxy war against the USSR. We reaped what we sowed.
bobspez
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:00 pm
Location: Southern NJ, USA

"KILLING PART OF NEW U.S. STRATEGY TO DETER FOES:"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:11 pm

Thursday
02.06.2020
1:11 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY.

Messrs. Phil Dragoo, and Bob Spez, Brilliant Delineated and Focused responses in each of your own
Excellent Styles.

I can stand still, and turn around in about 12" - 18" inches.

I can turn my Harley Davidson Motorcycle around in 20' - 30' feet.

I can turn my full size automobile sedan around in 40' - 60' feet.

It takes 5 - 10 miles to turn around an Air Craft Carrier and Battleship.

WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO TURN AROUND OUR AMERICAN SOCIETY ?

IN OUR AMERICAN SOCIETY WE KEEP ADVANCING SCIENTIFICALLY MUCH MORE, AND ARE WAY AHEAD OF
OUR EDUCATIONAL, LEGAL, and MORAL ADVANCEMENTS and TRAJECTORIES.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Last edited by Bruce Patrick Brychek on Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2512
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: "KILLING PART OF NEW U.S. STRATEGY TO DETER FOES:"

Postby bobspez » Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:16 pm

Thanks Bruce and Phil for your thought provoking posts and thoughts. What does it take to turn around a society? That is a complicated proposition. What has it taken in the past? Probably the will of the people and political leaders who were able to translate that will into law.

FDR created SS which allowed millions of people to grow old with dignity. Johnson added Medicare which allowed older people access to affordable health care. Nixon abolished the draft so young men were no longer forced to fight in foreign wars. A very affordable public college system subsidized by taxpayers allowed people with limited means to get a college degree and do better economically than their parents.

In all these cases the presidents and lawmakers responded to the needs of a majority of citizens. They did not do these things for lobbyists or special interests or the wealthy and powerful. JFK tried to do the same by disengaging from the Vietnam war and seeking to de-escalate the cold war with the Russians but was stopped.

So what does it take? I guess the answer is leadership that is moral and intelligent and responsive to the needs of the people.
bobspez
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:00 pm
Location: Southern NJ, USA


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron