"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: Bob, Phil Dragoo, Dealey Joe, kenmurray, dankbaar

"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:50 am

Thursday
01.16.2020
12:50 a.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY.

"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?", is the 500 page incredible book with pictures Treatise by Dr. Judy
Wood that I recently received from AMAZON Prime.

"EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY"

"IF YOU LISTEN TO THE EVIDENCE CAREFULLY ENOUGH, IT WILL SPEAK TO YOU AND TELL YOU EXACTLY
WHAT HAPPENED. IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED KEEP LISTENING UNTIL YOU DO. THE EVIDENCE
ALWAYS TELLS THE TRUTH. THE KEY IS NOT TO ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE DISTRACTED AWAY FROM SEEING
WHAT THE EVIDENCE IS TELLING YOU."

"EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IS THE TRUTH THAT THEORY MUST MIMIC."

"THANK YOU FOR HAVING THE COURAGE TO LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE."

DR. JUDY WOOD.

Copyright 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 by Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D.

As I have overall stated my approach to The Removal of JFK has focused mostly overall on The Top Down
Approach rather than The Bottom Up Approach because I know that JFK was successfully removed and it
was covered up even more successfully for 56+ years. I never really cared about bullets, shooters, shots,
spotters, teames, etc.

For 09.11.2001 I know that allegedly airplanes hit both 110 stories tall Twin Towers. I have been more focused
on how they were brought down, who planned it, and The 18+ Year Successful Cover-Up, never believing that
the Real Truth had been discovered, discussed, written about, etc.

I never believed the "Warren Commission-Omission Approach" to either The Removal of JFK, nor 09.11.2001.

MOVING ON:

1. THEORY 1: The Official 09.11.2001 Reports attribute the combination of the airplanes striking, causing
small explosions, and fires, that led to some form of structural failure.

This led to pancake collapsing that pulverized everything as both buildings collapsed in almost Free Fall Time
of 10 - 12 seconds.

2. THEORY 2: The Facts and Theories that I ultimately came to believe was that The Twin Towers and others
were Imploded.

3. THEORY 3: As I continued studying 09.11.2001 I became engrossed in the facts clearly and simply pointed out
by Dr. Judy Wood. WOOD ESPOUSES THAT THERE IS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE and IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF EVIDENCE
OF DIRECTED FREE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY WAS USED ON 09.11.2001.

While Wood does not specifically advance a Theory, she merely pushes looking at the Hidden Facts In Plain Sight,
WHERE DID ALL OF THE DEBRIS FROM THE TWIN TOWER'S GO IN 10 - 20 SECONDS ? DI

Clearly The Collapses, either according to Theory 1 or 2, would create substantially more rubble than is seen.

Having reviewed and studied all of her Seminars and Videos that I could locate over the last several day, I purchased
the latest edition of her book:

"WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO ?"

WITH LIVE INTERVIEWS WITHIN 2+ HOURS OF THE 09.11.2001 INCIDENTS MAJOR NEWS MEDIA, PETER JENNINGS,
GEORGE STEPHANOPOLOUS, and OTHERS, ALONG WITH EYE WITNESSES ARE ALL ASKING WHERE IS ALL OF THE
MATERIAL FROM ALL OF THE BUILDINGS ?

If Theory 1 is correct and all 110 stories fell in pancake fashion, crumbling, there should be considerably more
debris and rubble.

If Theory 2 is correct and all 110 stories fell in Implosion Style, crumbling even more, there should still be some
considerably more debris andrubble.

Dr. Wood's Interviews and pictures make clear that both basements of the 110 story buildings did not collapse
into the basements.

Additionally the Twin Towers are built 75 feet above the Water Table, and were enclosed in a "BATHTUB" that
kept out The Hudson River that was deviated and re-routed around The Twin Tower's Structural Basements.

Dr. Wood, interviews, and pictures immediately after the 09.11.2001 clearly show that there does not appear to be anywhere near sufficient rubble for all of the collapsed buildings.

There were Zero toilets found of the 45,000 toilets in the buildings.

There were Zero desks found of the 30,000+ desks in the buildings.

There was One melted file cabinet near the basement of one of the buildings of the approximately
45,000 file cabinets found in the basement in BEN & JERRYS.

IF ANYBODY HAS, OR DOES REVIEW AT LEAST THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF THE IMMEDIATE
09.11.2001 AFTERMATH, I WOULD WELCOME YOUR INPUT.

BUT PLEASE BELIEVE YOUR OWN EYES and COMMON SENSE, and IGNORE/FORGET WHAT YOU HAVE EITHER
READ OR BEEN TOLD.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:48 am

Thursday
01.16.2020
6:48 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY.

IF A TREE FALLS IN THE FOREST AND NOBODY IS THERE, DOES IT MAKE A SOUND ?

IF YOU DON'T STUDY ALTERNATIVE FACTS AND THEORIES, DOES IT MEAN THAT THEY
DON'T EXIST ?

DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN WORKED ON BY SEVERAL GOVERNMENTS SINCE WW II.

TO THINK OTHERWISE, OR BE UNAWARE OF THESE FACTS, AND THE POSSIBLE/PROBABLE DEVELOPMENTS
TO TODAY IS FOOLISH.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.


Pentagon Shifts Focus on Directed Energy Weapons Technology

By: Ben Werner
September 5, 2019 11:51 AM

Artist’s concept of a HELIOS laser system aboard a U.S. destroyer. Lockheed Martin Image

ARLINGTON, Va. – The Department of Defense is focusing its directed energy weapons research on technologies ready to field now, placing on the backburner plans to create more complex space-based technology, the Pentagon’s head of research said on Wednesday.

Exploring the usefulness of directed energy, specifically figuring out how to increase the wattage of these weapons, is the Pentagon’s focus now, Michael Griffin, the undersecretary of defense for research and engineering, said during a keynote address at the 2019 Defense News conference. In practical terms, this means the Pentagon wants technologies ready to deploy in the near-term and is shelving plans to develop systems that are years away from initial testing.

“We’re looking at high powered microwaves,” Griffin said. “We’re deferring work on neutral particle beams indefinitely. It’s just not near-enough term.”

Griffin’s comments Wednesday signal a narrowing focus for the Pentagon’s directed energy development. In March, the Pentagon was fully behind developing a space-based neutral particle beam, a directed energy project that has its roots in the 1980s.

“The neutral particle beam is a game-changing space-based directed-energy capability for strategic and regional missile defense. MDA will design, develop and conduct a feasibility demonstration of a first stage accelerator subsystem,” according to the Fiscal Year 2020 Research Development Test and Evaluation department-wide project justification for the Missile Defense Agency.

The Pentagon planned neutral particle beam spending of $34 million in the next fiscal year and up to $380 million during the next four years. The funding would be used to conduct detailed systems engineering of the technology. The idea is to use neutral particles to bombard incoming targets with enough energy to disrupt, incapacitate or kill the threat, according to the FY 2020 project justification.

Instead, Griffin said his preference now is to invest in directed energy capabilities that can be fielded now, so researchers can get to figuring out how to improve them.

“We’re focusing on nearer-term uses of directed energy, particularly lasers of higher power than we currently have,” Griffin said.

The Navy, for example, plans to install a High Energy Laser and Integrated Optical-dazzler with Surveillance (HELIOS) weapon system aboard a West Coast-based Arleigh Burke-class Flight IIA destroyer in 2021, according to comments made in March by Rear Adm. Ron Boxall during the Booz Allen Hamilton and CSBA Directed Energy Summit 2019.

The Pentagon is looking for a boost in directed energy capabilities, Griffin said. Current directed energy technology operates in the realm of tens of kilowatts, but to be useful Griffin said these weapons need to run in at least the hundreds of kilowatts realm.

“I think the key – my own personal opinion, having been involved in directed energy for three decades – my own opinion is we need to get systems built and out onto weapons platforms so we can see what they do, how they do it,” Griffin said. “We need to better understand the lethality of such systems. We need to understand things like heat control, and we need to know how to scale them up in practical ways.”

The HELIOS program is part of a larger Navy laser weapon strategy that would feed lessons learned back into research and then fielding of more powerful weapons.

The Pentagon’s directed energy signals also appear to be received by the defense industry. Demand for directed energy weapons was among the justifications cited by officials with Raytheon and United Technologies when explaining the reasoning behind their planned deal to combine companies.

If shareholders and federal regulators approve the United Technologies purchase of Raytheon, the cash flow from the combined operations would fuel the development of directed energy weapons, the chief executives of both firms said during their second-quarter company conference calls with analysts in July.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: "WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby kenmurray » Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:59 am

kenmurray
 
Posts: 5182
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: "WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Slav » Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:39 am

This is what I believe took down the twin towers it kills a tank, they said there was molten steel flowing for weeks, watch video, also where did all the debris go ??

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rdCsbZf1_Ng
Who shot JFK - Files, Nicoletti,Roselli, Jack Lawrence, Frank Sturgis, Roscoe White, and others
Who shot MLK- police officer Frank Strausser.
Who shot RFK - Thane Caesar
All Cia hired assasins
User avatar
Slav
 
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:08 pm

"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:26 am

Thursday
01.16.2020
9:26 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY:

The more I analyze, read, research, and study about DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONRY, the more I realize
how little I know about this Subject Matter.

I am increasing my research and studies about this. All assistance and support is appreciated.

The Nazis in the 1940's began working in Secret About The Ultimate Weapons.

What is available, and has already been achieved today ?

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.



DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONRY:

The energy can come in various forms:

Electromagnetic radiation, including radio frequency, microwave, lasers and masers,

Particles with mass, in particle-beam weapons (technically a form of micro-projectile weapon),

Sound, in sonic weapons,

DEWs can be used discreetly without anyone knowing as radiation used in ranges such as RF (Radio Frequency=3 kHz to 300 GHz) is invisible and can pass through walls.[3][4],

DEWs tend to be categorised by the frequency in which they operate such as RF (for radio frequency) and Laser, or the way in which they operate.

Although some devices are labelled as Microwave Weapons; the microwave range is commonly defined as being between 300Mhz and 300Ghz which is within the RF range.[5] Some examples of weapons which have been publicized by the military are as follows:

Active Denial System is a millimeter wave source that heats the water in the target's skin and thus causes incapacitating pain. It is being used by the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and Raytheon for riot-control duty. Though intended to cause severe pain while leaving no lasting damage, some concern has been voiced as to whether the system could cause irreversible damage to the eyes. There has yet to be testing for long-term side effects of exposure to the microwave beam. It can also destroy unshielded electronics: see TEMPEST (research into unintended electronic release of information).[6] The device comes in various sizes including attached to a humvee.

Vigilant Eagle is an airport defense system that directs high-frequency microwaves towards any projectile that is fired at an aircraft.[7] The system consists of a missile–detecting and tracking subsystem (MDT), a command and control system, and a scanning array. The MDT is a fixed grid of passive infrared (IR) cameras. The command and control system determines the missile launch point. The scanning array projects microwaves that disrupt the surface-to-air missile's guidance system, deflecting it from the aircraft.[8]

Bofors HPM Blackout is a high-powered microwave weapon system which is stated to be able to destroy at distance a wide variety of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) electronic equipment. It is stated to be not lethal to humans.[9][10][11]

Lasers are often used for sighting, ranging and targeting for guns; in these cases the laser beam is not the source of the weapon's firepower.

Laser weapons usually generate brief high-energy pulses. A one megajoule laser pulse delivers roughly the same energy as 200 grams of high explosive, and has the same basic effect on a target. The primary damage mechanism is mechanical shear, caused by reaction when the surface of the target is explosively evaporated.[citation needed]

Most existing weaponized lasers are gas dynamic lasers. Fuel, or a powerful turbine, pushes the lasing media through a circuit or series of orifices. The high-pressures and heating cause the medium to form a plasma and lase. A major difficulty with these systems is preserving the high-precision mirrors and windows of the laser resonating cavity. Most systems use a low-powered "oscillator" laser to generate a coherent wave, and then amplify it. Some experimental laser amplifiers do not use windows or mirrors, but have open orifices, which cannot be destroyed by high energies.

Some lasers are used as non-lethal weapons, such as dazzlers which are designed to temporarily blind or distract people or sensors.

An electrolaser lets blooming occur, and then sends a powerful electric current down the conducting ionized track of plasma so formed, somewhat like lightning. It functions as a giant high energy long-distance version of the Taser or stun gun.

Pulsed Energy Projectile or PEP systems emit an infrared laser pulse which creates rapidly expanding plasma at the target. The resulting sound, shock and electromagnetic waves stun the target and cause pain and temporary paralysis. The weapon is under development and is intended as a non-lethal weapon in crowd control.

On March 18, 2009 Northrop Grumman announced that its engineers in Redondo Beach had successfully built and tested an electric laser capable of producing a 100-kilowatt ray of light, powerful enough to destroy cruise missiles, artillery, rockets and mortar rounds.[12] An electric laser is theoretically capable, according to Brian Strickland, manager for the United States Army's Joint High Power Solid State Laser program, of being mounted in an aircraft, ship, or vehicle because it requires much less space for its supporting equipment than a chemical laser.[13]
On April 6, 2011, the U.S. Navy successfully tested a laser gun, manufactured by Northrop Grumman, that was mounted on the former USS Paul Foster, which is currently used as the navy's test ship. When engaged during the test that occurred off the coast of Central California in the Pacific Ocean test range, the laser gun was documented as having "a destructive effect on a high-speed cruising target," said Chief of Naval Research Admiral Nevin Carr.[14] While classified, the range of the laser gun is attributed to miles, not yards.
Northrop Grumman has announced the availability of a high-energy solid-state laser weapon system that they call FIRESTRIKE, introduced on 13 November 2008. The system is modular, using 15 kW modules that can be combined to provide various levels of power.

On 19 July 2010 an anti-aircraft laser described as the Laser Close-In Weapon System was unveiled at the Farnborough Airshow.[15]

The Zeus laser weapon is the first laser and the first energy weapon of any type to be used on a battlefield. It is used for neutralizing mines and unexploded ordnance.
Laser Area Defense System.

The Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL) is an experimental U.S. Navy deuterium fluoride laser and was tested against an Air Force satellite in 1997.

In 2011, the U.S. Navy began to test the Maritime Laser Demonstrator (MLD), a laser for use aboard its warships.[16][17]

In 2013 the U.S. began field testing a directed-energy weapon it calls the Laser Weapon System.[18]

Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response, or PHaSR, is a non-lethal hand-held weapon developed by the United States Air Force[19] Its purpose is to "dazzle" or stun a target. It was developed by Air Force's Directed Energy Directorate.

Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) is a weaponized deuterium fluoride laser developed in a joint research project by Israel and the U.S. It is designed to shoot down aircraft and missiles. See also National missile defense.

Soviet/Russian Beriev A-60: a CO2 gas laser mounted on an Ilyushin Il-76MD transport.

The U.S. Air Force's Airborne Laser, or Advanced Tactical Laser, was a plan to mount a CO2 gas laser or COIL chemical laser on a modified Boeing 747 to shoot down missiles.[20][21]

Laser weapons could have several main advantages over conventional weaponry:

Laser beams travel at the speed of light, so there is no need (except over extremely long distances) to compensate for target movement. Consequently, evading an accurately aimed laser after it has been fired is impossible.

Because of its extremely high speed, light is only slightly affected by gravity, so that long-range projection requires little compensation. Other aspects such as wind speed can be neglected at most times, unless shooting through an absorption matter.

Lasers can change focusing configuration to provide an active area that can be much smaller or larger than projectile weaponry.

Given a sufficient power source, laser weapons could essentially have limitless ammunition.

Because light has a practically zero ratio of momentum to energy (exactly 1/c), lasers produce negligible recoil.

The operational range of a laser weapon can be much larger than that of a ballistic weapon, depending on atmospheric conditions and power level.

Laser beams do not generate sound or light that would be detected by human senses when emitted, so the weapon would not betray its user's position when fired.

Modern ballistic weapons commonly feature systems to counter many of the undesirable side-effects mentioned above. As such, laser weapons' advantage over ballistics could end up more about elegance and cost.

Existing methods of storing, conducting, transforming, and directing energy are inadequate to produce a convenient hand-held weapon. Existing lasers waste much energy as heat, requiring still-bulky cooling equipment to avoid overheating damage. Air cooling can yield an unacceptable delay between shots. These problems, which severely limit laser weapon practicality at present, might be offset by:

More convenient high-volume electricity storage/generation. Part of the energy could be used to cool the device.

Chemical lasers use energy from a suitable chemical reaction instead of electricity. Chemical oxygen iodine laser (hydrogen peroxide with iodine) and deuterium fluoride laser (atomic fluorine reacting with deuterium) are two laser types capable of megawatt-range continuous beam output. Managing chemical fuel presents its own problems, and issues with cooling and overall inefficiency remain.

These problems could be lessened if the weapon were mounted either at a defensive position near a power plant, or on board a large, possibly nuclear powered, water-going ship, as it would have the advantage of plentiful water for cooling.

Laser beams begin to cause plasma breakdown in the atmosphere at energy densities of around one megajoule per cubic centimetre. This effect, called "blooming," causes the laser to defocus and disperse energy into the surrounding air. Blooming can be more severe if there is fog, smoke, or dust in the air.

Spreading the beam across a large, curved mirror that focuses the power on the target, to keep energy density in route too low for blooming to happen. This requires a large, very precise, fragile mirror, mounted somewhat like a searchlight, requiring bulky machinery to slew the mirror to aim the laser.

Using a phased array. For typical laser wavelengths, this method would require billions of micrometre-size antennae. There is currently no known way to implement these, though carbon nanotubes have been proposed. Phased arrays could theoretically also perform phase-conjugate amplification (see below). Phased arrays do not require mirrors or lenses, and can be made flat and thus do not require a turret-like system (as in "spread beam") to be aimed, though range will suffer at extreme angles (that is, the angle the beam forms to the surface of the phased array).[23]

Using a phase-conjugate laser system. This method employs a "finder" or "guide" laser illuminating the target. Any mirror-like ("specular") points on the target reflect light that is sensed by the weapon's primary amplifier. The weapon then amplifies inverted waves in a positive feedback loop, destroying the target with shockwaves as the specular regions evaporate. This avoids blooming because the waves from the target pass through the blooming, and therefore show the most conductive optical path; this automatically corrects for the distortions caused by blooming. Experimental systems using this method usually use special chemicals to form a "phase-conjugate mirror". In most systems, the mirror overheats dramatically at weapon-useful power levels.

Focusing multiple lasers of relatively low power on a single target.

Another problem with weaponized lasers is that the evaporated material from the target's surface begins to shade. There are several approaches to this problem:

Inducing a standing shockwave in the ablation cloud. The shockwave then continues to inflict damage.

Scanning the target faster than the shockwave propagates.

Inducing plasmic optical mixing at the target by modulating the transparency of the target's ablation cloud to one laser by another laser, perhaps by tuning the laser to the absorption spectra of the ablation cloud, and inducing population inversion in the cloud. The other laser then induces local lasing in the ablation cloud. The beat frequency that results can induce frequencies that penetrate the ablation cloud.

A laser beam or particle beam passing through air can be absorbed or scattered by rain, snow, dust, fog, smoke, or similar visual obstructions that a bullet would easily penetrate. This effect adds to blooming problems and makes the dissipation of energy into the atmosphere worse.

The wasted energy can disrupt cloud development since the impact wave creates a "tunneling effect". Engineers from MIT and the U.S. Army are looking into using this effect for precipitation management.

Indirect fire, as used in artillery warfare, can reach a target behind a hill, but is not feasible with line-of-sight DEWs. Possible alternatives are to mount the lasers (or perhaps just reflectors) on airborne or space-based platforms.

A hydrogen radio frequency discharge, the first element inside a hydrogen maser.

A maser is a device that produces coherent electromagnetic waves through amplification by stimulated emission. Historically, "maser" derives from the original, upper-case acronym MASER, which stands for "Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation". The lower-case usage arose from technological development having rendered the original denotation imprecise, because contemporary masers emit EM waves (microwave and radio frequencies) across a broader band of the electromagnetic spectrum; thus, the physicist Charles H. Townes's suggested usage of "molecular" replacing "microwave", for contemporary linguistic accuracy.[24] In 1957, when the optical coherent oscillator was first developed, it was denominated optical maser, but usually called laser (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation), the acronym Gordon Gould established in 1957.

Particle-beam weapons can use charged or neutral particles, and can be either endoatmospheric or exoatmospheric. Particle beams as beam weapons are theoretically possible, but practical weapons have not been demonstrated. Certain types of particle beams have the advantage of being self-focusing in the atmosphere.

Blooming is also a problem in particle-beam weapons. Energy that would otherwise be focused on the target spreads out; the beam becomes less effective:

Thermal blooming occurs in both charged and neutral particle beams, and occurs when particles bump into one another under the effects of thermal vibration, or bump into air molecules.
Electrical blooming occurs only in charged particle beams, as ions of like charge repel one another.

Plasma weapons fire a beam, bolt, or stream of plasma, which is an excited state of matter consisting of atomic electrons & nuclei and free electrons if ionized, or other particles if pinched.

The MARAUDER (Magnetically Accelerated Ring to Achieve Ultra-high Directed-Energy and Radiation) used the Shiva Star project (a high energy capacitor bank which provided the means to test weapons and other devices requiring brief and extremely large amounts of energy) to accelerate a toroid of plasma at a significant percentage of the speed of light.[26]

In a vacuum (e.g., in space), an electric discharge can travel a potentially unlimited distance at a velocity slightly slower than the speed of light. This is because there is no significant electric resistance to the flow of electric current in a vacuum. This would make such devices useful to destroy the electrical and electronic parts of satellites and spacecraft. However, in a vacuum the electric current cannot ride a laser beam, and some other means must be used to keep the electron beam on track and to prevent it from dispersing: see particle beam.

The speed of the energy weapon is determined by the density of the beam. If it is very dense then it is very powerful, but a particle beam moves much slower than the speed of light. Its speed is determined by mass, power, density, or particle/energy density.

Cavitation, which affects gas nuclei in human tissue, and heating can result from exposure to ultrasound and can damage tissue and organs. Studies have found[citation needed] that exposure to high intensity ultrasound at frequencies from 700 kHz to 3.6 MHz can cause lung and intestinal damage in mice. Heart rate patterns following vibroacoustic stimulation have resulted in serious arterial flutter and bradycardia. Researchers have concluded that generating pain through the auditory system using high intensity sound risked permanent hearing damage.

A multi-organization research program[27] involved high intensity audible sound experiments on human subjects. Extra-aural (unrelated to hearing) bioeffects on various internal organs and the central nervous system included auditory shifts, vibrotactile sensitivity change, muscle contraction, cardiovascular function change, central nervous system effects, vestibular (inner ear) effects, and chest wall/lung tissue effects. Researchers found that low frequency sonar exposure could result in significant cavitations, hypothermia, and tissue shearing. Follow-on experiments were not recommended.

Tests performed on mice show the threshold for both lung and liver damage occurs at about 184 dB. Damage increases rapidly as intensity is increased. Noise-induced neurological disturbances in humans exposed to continuous low frequency tones for durations longer than 15 minutes involved development of immediate and long-term problems affecting brain tissue. The symptoms resembled those of individuals who had suffered minor head injuries. One theory for a causal mechanism is that the prolonged sound exposure resulted in enough mechanical strain to brain tissue to induce an encephalopathy.[28]

According to legend, the concept of the "burning mirror" or death ray began with Archimedes who created a mirror with an adjustable focal length (or more likely, a series of mirrors focused on a common point) to focus sunlight on ships of the Roman fleet as they invaded Syracuse, setting them on fire. Historians point out that the earliest accounts of the battle did not mention a "burning mirror", but merely stated that Archimedes's ingenuity combined with a way to hurl fire were relevant to the victory. Some attempts to replicate this feat have had some success (though not on any of three attempts by the MythBusters television program). In particular, an experiment by students at MIT showed that a mirror-based weapon was at least possible, if not necessarily practical.[29]

In 1935, the British Air Ministry asked Robert Watson-Watt of the Radio Research Station whether a "death ray" was possible. He and colleague Arnold Wilkins quickly concluded that it was not feasible, but as a consequence suggested using radio for the detection of aircraft and this started the development of radar in Britain. See: History of radar#Robert Watson-Watt.

Engine-stopping rays are a variant that occurs in fiction and myth. Such stories were circulating in Britain around 1938. The tales varied but in general terms told of tourists whose car engine suddenly died and were then approached by a German soldier who told them that they had to wait. The soldier returned a short time later to say that the engine would now work and the tourists drove off. A possible origin of some of these stories arises from the testing of the television transmitter in Feldberg, Germany. Because electrical noise from car engines would interfere with field strength measurements, sentries would stop all traffic in the vicinity for the twenty minutes or so needed for a test. A distorted retelling of the events might give rise to the idea that a transmission killed the engine.[30]

Modern automobile engines are not mechanically but electronically controlled. Disabling the electronics can indeed stop the engine. This has been implemented in OnStar, which has a remote control feature, but this is not a weapon. It is an add-on to the electronics of the car. Because a car is operating on a closed system, it would be impossible to use an electronic means of disengaging an engine, short of electrocuting it via laser or pulse weaponry. See also electromagnetic pulse (EMP), which is known for its engine-stopping effect, but is an undirected-energy weapon.

Nikola Tesla (1856–1943), a noted inventor, scientist and electrical engineer, developed early high frequency technologies. Tesla worked on plans for a directed-energy weapon from the early 1900s until his death. In 1937, Tesla composed a treatise entitled The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media concerning charged particle beams.[31]

During the early 1940s Axis engineers developed a sonic cannon that could literally shake a person apart from the inside. A methane gas combustion chamber leading to two parabolic dishes pulse-detonated at roughly 44 Hz. This infrasound, magnified by the dish reflectors, caused vertigo and nausea at 200–400 metres (220–440 yd) by vibrating the middle ear bones and shaking the cochlear fluid within the inner ear. At distances of 50–200 metres (160–660 ft), the sound waves could act on organ tissues and fluids by repeatedly compressing and releasing compressive resistant organs such as the kidneys, spleen, and liver. (It had little detectable effect on malleable organs such as the heart, stomach and intestines.) Lung tissue was affected at only the closest ranges as atmospheric air is highly compensable and only the blood rich alveoli resist compression. In practice, the weapon system was highly vulnerable to enemy fire. Rifle, bazooka and mortar rounds easily deformed the parabolic reflectors, rendering the wave amplification ineffective.[32]

In the later phases of World War II, Nazi Germany increasingly put its hopes on research into technologically revolutionary secret weapons, the Wunderwaffen.

Among the directed-energy weapons the Nazis investigated were X-Ray Beam Weapons developed under Heinz Schmellenmeier, Richard Gans and Fritz Houtermans. They built an electron accelerator called Rheotron (invented by Max Steenbeck at Siemens-Schuckert in the 1930s, these were later called Betatrons by the Americans) to generate hard X-ray synchrotron beams for the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM). The intent was to pre-ionize ignition in Aircraft engines and hence serve as anti-aircraft DEW and bring planes down into the reach of the FLAK. The Rheotron was captured by the Americans in Burggrub on April 14, 1945.

Another approach was Ernst Schiebolds 'Röntgenkanone' developed from 1943 in Großostheim near Aschaffenburg. The Company Richert Seifert & Co from Hamburg delivered parts.[33]

The Third Reich further developed sonic weaponry, using parabolic reflectors to project sound waves of destructive force. Microwave weapons were investigated together with the Japanese.

In the 1980s, U.S. President Ronald Reagan proposed the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) program, which was nicknamed Star Wars. It suggested that lasers, perhaps space-based X-ray lasers, could destroy ICBMs in flight. Though the strategic missile defense concept has continued to the present under the Missile Defense Agency, most of the directed-energy weapon concepts were shelved. However, Boeing has been somewhat successful with the Boeing YAL-1 and Boeing NC-135, the first of which destroyed two missiles in February 2010. Funding has been cut to both of the programs.scsCSCSCsac

During the Iraq War, electromagnetic weapons, including high power microwaves were used by the U.S. military to disrupt and destroy the Iraqi electronic systems and may have been used for crowd control. Types and magnitudes of exposure to electromagnetic fields are unknown.[34]

The Soviets invested some effort in the development of ruby and carbon dioxide lasers as anti-ballistic missile systems, and later as a tracking and anti-satellite system. There are reports that the Terra-3 complex at Sary Shagan was used on several occasions to temporarily "blind" US spy satellites in the IR range.

It has been claimed that Russia made use of the lasers at the Terra-3 site to target the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1984. At the time, the Soviets were concerned that the shuttle was being used as a reconnaissance platform. On 10 October 1984 (STS-41-G), the Terra-3 tracking laser was allegedly aimed at Challenger as it passed over the facility. Early reports claimed that this was responsible for causing "malfunctions on the space shuttle and distress to the crew." The United States filed a diplomatic protest about the incident.[35][36] However, this story is comprehensively denied by the crew members of STS-41-G and knowledgeable members of the US intelligence community.[37]

Dazzlers are devices used for temporarily blinding or stunning an attacker, or to stop a driver in a moving vehicle. Targets can also include mechanical sensors or aircraft. Dazzlers emit infrared or invisible light against various electronic sensors, and visible light against humans, when they are intended to cause no long-term damage to eyes. The emitters are usually lasers, making what is termed a laser dazzler. Most of the contemporary systems are man-portable, and operate in either the red (a laser diode) or green (a diode-pumped solid-state laser, DPSS) areas of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Currently, the technology is being considered for non-military use to protect Earth from asteroids.[38]

Main article: Non-lethal weapons

The TECOM Technology Symposium in 1997 concluded on non-lethal weapons, "determining the target effects on personnel is the greatest challenge to the testing community", primarily because "the potential of injury and death severely limits human tests".[39]

Also, "directed energy weapons that target the central nervous system and cause neurophysiological disorders may violate the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention of 1980. Weapons that go beyond non-lethal intentions and cause "superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering" may also violate the Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1977."[40]

Some common bio-effects of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons include:

Difficulty breathing
Disorientation
Nausea
Pain
Vertigo
Other systemic discomfort.
Interference with breathing poses the most significant, potentially lethal results.

Light and repetitive visual signals can induce epileptic seizures. Vection and motion sickness can also occur.

Cruise ships are known to use sonic weapons (such as LRAD) to drive off pirates.[41]

Active Denial System (ADS), a non-lethal directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. military, for area denial, perimeter security and crowd control
Electronic warfare
Electromagnetic weapon
German WW 2 Sonic Cannon
Laser applications
List of laser articles
List of plasma (physics) applications articles
NotesEdit
↑ "Daily Telegraph, 12th September 2013", Golden Eye-style energy beam is developed by Nato scientists, Oct. 08, 2013
↑ "Milsat Magazine, Satnews Daily, June 24th 2009", U.S. Navy Laser Versus UAVs... Laser Wins..., Oct. 08, 2013
↑ "Defence IQ talks to Dr Palíšek about Directed Energy Weapon systems", Defence iQ', Nov. 20, 2012
↑ Spectrum Tutorial, University of Wisconsin Electromagnetic Spectrum Tutorial, accessed 22/06/2013
↑ RF vs Microwave Freq range, Microwaves and radio waves
↑ "The Pentagon's Ray Gun". CBS News. 2008-06-01. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/ ... 1865.shtml. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
↑ Raytheon focuses on non-lethal weapons,Andrew Johnson, (The Arizona Republic, 09-17-2009)
↑ [1][dead link]
↑ [2][dead link]
↑ Magnus Karlsson (2009). "Bofors HPM Blackout". Artilleri-Tidskrift (2-2009): s. s 12-15. Retrieved 2010-01-04.
↑ Google search
↑ Joint High Power Solid-State Laser fact sheet, Northrop Grumman Corporation, April 22, 2008 [3]
↑ Pae, Peter, "Northrop Advance Brings Era Of The Laser Gun Closer", Los Angeles Times, March 19, 2009., p. B2.
↑ Northrop Grumman (2010-04-07). "Navy Shows Off Powerful New Laser Weapon.". Foxnews.com. http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/04/ ... test=faces. Retrieved 2011-09-25.
↑ Emery, Daniel (2010-07-19). "BBC News - Anti-aircraft laser unveiled at Farnborough Airshow". Bbc.co.uk. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10682693. Retrieved 2011-09-25.
↑ MLD Test Moves Navy a Step Closer to Lasers for Ship Self-Defense, official press release, 4/8/11.
↑ Navy tests laser gun by zapping motorboat off California coast, LA Times, 4/11/11.
↑ Luis Martinez (09 APR 2013). "Navy's New Laser Weapon Blasts Bad Guys From Air, Sea". http://news.yahoo.com/navys-laser-weapo ... 08231.html. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
↑ Air Force Link News story on the PHaSR handheld rifle-style weapon. 2 November 2005.
↑ Wired News article "Weapons Freeze, Microwave Enemies" (and copied in at least 661 other web pages including this link[dead link] )
↑ Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser (ABL) | Photos and Pictures
↑ "The Leading Mil Net Site on the Net". milnet.com. http://www.milnet.com/pentagon/new-weap ... -q4-08.htm. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
↑ Atomic Rocket: Space War: Weapons
↑ Charles H. Townes – Nobel Lecture
↑ The Dual Noble Gas Maser, Harvard University, Department of Physics
↑ "Energy Citations Database (ECD) - - Document #7369133". Osti.gov. Digital object identifier:10.1063/1.860681. http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/pro ... id=7369133. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
↑ Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory (Groton, Connecticut), Navy Experimental Diving Unit (Panama City, Florida), SCC San Diego, Navy Medical Research and Development Command (Bethesda, Maryland), Underwater Sound Reference Detachment of Naval Undersea Warfare Center (Orlando, Florida), Applied Research Laboratories: University of Texas at Austin, Applied Physics Laboratory: University of Washington, Institute for Sensory Research: Syracuse University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Boston University, The University of Vermont, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, University of Rochester, University of Minnesota, University of Illinois system, Loyola University, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York
↑ "Non-Lethal Swimmer Neutralization Study"; Applied Research Laboratories; The University of Texas at Austin; G2 Software Systems, Inc., San Diego; TECHNICAL DOCUMENT 3138; May 2002 Non-Lethal Swimmer Neutralization Study
↑ Archimedes Death Ray: Idea Feasibility Testing
↑ Jones, R.V. (1978). Most Secret War: British Scientific Intelligence 1939–1945. Coronet. pp. 84,124. ISBN 0-340-24169-1.
↑ Seifer, Marc J., Wizard, the Life and Times of Nikola Tesla. ISBN (HC) pg. 454.
↑ "Weird Weapons: The Axis" (in English). 21 February 2006.
↑ "Forschungsstätte für Hitlers "Todesstrahlen"". Main-netz.de. 2009-08-19. http://www.main-netz.de/nachrichten/reg ... 986,883119. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
↑ U.S. Senate - Committee on Veterans Affairs: Hearings - Gulf War Illnesses; Testimony to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee; Meryl Nass, MD, Director of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Mount Desert Island Hospital Bar Harbor, Maine; September 25, 2007 [4]
↑ Kononenko, Boris. "Silent Space Is Being Monitored". http://www.fas.org/news/russia/1996/druma189_s96005.htm. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
↑ Zaloga, Steven. "RED STAR WARS". http://www.oook.info/dyson/sdi.html. Retrieved 21 July 2011.
↑ "STS-41-G". Astronautix.com. http://www.astronautix.com/flights/sts41g.htm. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
↑ "End of the World 2013: DE-STAR Project Proposed after Asteroid 2012 DA14 Flyby, Russian Meteor Blast", International Business Times, Feb. 22, 2013
↑ Human Effects Advisory Panel Program; presented to: NDIANon-Lethal Defense IV [5]
↑ Non-Lethal Weaponry: From Tactical to Strategic Applications; Colonel Dennis B. Herbert, USMC (Ret.), program developer, Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technologies at Pennsylvania State University; pg. 4 [6]
↑ Smith, David (November 22, 2006). "Pirates shoot at Britons' cruise liner". The Guardian. London. http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2005/n ... heobserver.
The E-Bomb: How America's New Directed Energy Weapons Will Change the Way Future Wars Will Be Fought. Doug Beason (2005). ISBN 0-306-81402-1
US claims that China has used high-energy lasers to interfere with US satellites: Jane's Defence
China jamming test sparks U.S. satellite concerns: USA Today
Beijing secretly fires lasers to disable US satellites: The Telegraph
China Attempted To Blind U.S. Satellites With Laser: Defense News
China Has Not Attacked US Satellites Says DoD: United Press International
SpaceWar
Gertz, Bill (July 21, 2011). "Report: China building electromagnetic pulse weapons for use against U.S. carriers". The Washington Times. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... n-weapons/. Retrieved April 29, 2012.
Hambling, David (October 10, 2008). "Army Orders Pain Ray Trucks; New Report Shows 'Potential for Death'". Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/10 ... rdering-p/. Retrieved April 29, 2012.
Beckhusen, Robert (April 1, 2013). "Air Force Wants New Energy Weapons to Cause Non-Lethal 'Bioeffects'". Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/04 ... ed-energy/. Retrieved April 1, 2013.
</dl>
External linksEdit
Directed Energy Weapons @ Air Power Australia
Applied Energetics - Photonic and high-voltage energetics (formerly Ionatron)
Wired News (AP) article on weapons deployment in Iraq, Active Denial System and Stunstrike, July 10, 2005
Boeing Tests Laser-Mounted Humvee as IED Hunter, November 13, 2007
WSTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1 - Directed Energy Weapons
Ogonek Report on '21st Century Weapons'
How 'Revolutionary' Is CHAMP, New Air Force Microwave Weapon?, November 28, 2012 By David Axe
DARPA: Better Understanding of Human Brain Supports National Security [7]
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Categories:
All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from November 2014 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November 2014 Articles incorporating text from Wikipedia Directed-energy weapons Science fiction weapons Energy weapons Non-lethal weapons Physics in fiction Electromagnetic radiation Add category
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Jeff Mellinger
Copyright 2020 Fandom, Inc.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: "WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Slav » Fri Jan 17, 2020 8:37 am

Who shot JFK - Files, Nicoletti,Roselli, Jack Lawrence, Frank Sturgis, Roscoe White, and others
Who shot MLK- police officer Frank Strausser.
Who shot RFK - Thane Caesar
All Cia hired assasins
User avatar
Slav
 
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:08 pm

Re: "WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Slav » Fri Jan 17, 2020 8:38 am

Who shot JFK - Files, Nicoletti,Roselli, Jack Lawrence, Frank Sturgis, Roscoe White, and others
Who shot MLK- police officer Frank Strausser.
Who shot RFK - Thane Caesar
All Cia hired assasins
User avatar
Slav
 
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:08 pm

"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:25 am

Monday
01.20.2020
6:25 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solver Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY.

I completely, totally disagree with Fetzer.

No Mini-Nukes, nor were Nuclear Bombs or Charges of any kind used on the Twin Towers.

The Radiation Tests made no such determination.

I think that Fetzer is a Jack of All Trades, and a Master of None.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

"WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:36 am

Monday
01.20.2020
6:36 p.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solver Forum Members and Readers:

BEST REGARDS TO EVERYBODY.

I am watching and studying all of Dr. Judy Wood's material that I can.

I watched and studied Dr. Jenkins videos, and "debates" with Dr. Judy Wood.

I came away with thinking that Dr. Jenkins was more of a smart aleck than a smart person.

Jenkins came away with more discrediting of himself, and bolstering of my admiration and
respect for the methodologies of Dr. Judy Wood.

Dr. Wood's total focus on the evidence, debris, and lack there of, raises more questions in
my mind than anybody else has solved.

LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE, THE PICTURES THE AFTERNOON OF 09.11.2001. WHERE HAS 2,000,000 TONS
OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND CONTENTS GONE ?

I am not sure where. But I admire Dr. Judy Wood pointing out how 19 years after 09.11.2001 "We the
People..." are still totally clueless.

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: "WHERE DID THE TWIN TOWERS GO ?"

Postby kenmurray » Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:53 pm

The web site of Dr. Judy Wood:

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/
kenmurray
 
Posts: 5182
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:55 pm


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests