ONCE CIA, ALWAYS CIA:

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: Bob, Phil Dragoo, Dealey Joe, kenmurray, dankbaar

ONCE CIA, ALWAYS CIA:

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Fri Nov 01, 2019 3:25 pm

Friday
11.01.2019
10:25 a.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

Several Caveats that I am wrestling with simultaneously. Think along with me, please. Then give
me your Honest Pro vs. Con. Thank you.

* The Removals of JFK, MX, MLK, and RFK Created Martyrs. The Deep State, The Secret State, and
The High Cabal have learned that Actual Assassination creates a seemingly Never Ending Problem.

* Character Assassination can/must/now/often/should proceed Actual Assassination.

* The Concept of Democracy in America is a Placebo for "We the People..."

* Once CIA, always CIA.

* The President is largely a Bobble Head who has minimal powers, and must Remain On Track.

* How did a CIA Agent get into Trump's Inner Circle ?

* Was this CIA Agent a "Sleeper CIA Agent" one of many planted and stationed all over the
American Government Landscape to Report Back for the benefit of The Deep State, The
Secret State, and The High Cabal ?

* The General Rule of Law is that the Accused or the Defendant has an Absolute Right to face
his/her Accuser.

* The General Rule of Law "We the People..." are now told is that the Accused or the Defendant
HAS NO RIGHT TO FACE HIS/HER ACCUSER IF THEY ARE CIA !

* Is this Proof Positive that the CIA penetrates, monitors, and reports back for The Benefit of
The Deep State, The Secret State, and The High Cabal in Agencies and Departments all over
The American Government possibly at the city, county, state, and federal levels ?

* Can "We the People..." Trace Penetration, Monitoring, and Reporting Back of the CIA to The
Deep State, The Secret State, and The High Cabal to The Removal of JFK, and probably before ?

* Trump came in like a Bull in a China Store Draining The Swamp. Has he gone as far as he will
be allowed ?

* Are The Impeachment Hearings Warning Shots being fired across Trump's bow, to get him back
On Track, and Under Control ?

* Were JFK, MLK, and RFK given Warning Shots that they failed to heed ?

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.



Friday November 01, 2019
Trump Allies Push to Unmask Whistleblower on Ukraine
Thursday, 31 October 2019 05:23 PM

The explosive allegations have been largely corroborated. The whistleblower's identity is legally protected. But conservative
allies of President Donald Trump are trying to unmask the intelligence community official whose complaint served as the
catalyst for Democrat-led impeachment probe.

The CIA official's identity has been cloaked in secrecy since the September revelation of the whistleblower complaint that
raised alarms about the president's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. In the July 25 call, Trump pressed
the new leader of the eastern European country to investigate Trump's political rivals.

The whistleblower's secondhand account of the call provided a roadmap for House Democrats investigating whether the
president and others in his orbit pressured Ukraine to probe political opponents, including former Vice President Joe Biden.
Now the Washington guessing game over the whistleblower's identity is taking a more perilous turn as Trump allies, relying
on scant biographical details, work to pierce the person's anonymity in a bid to defend the president.

Congressional Republicans on Thursday seized on conservative media reports that purported to identify the whistleblower.

"If the reports about the whistleblower's identity are true, it raises grave, fundamental concerns about the basis of this
Ukraine investigation," tweeted Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a staunch Trump defender, tweeted out a link to a report about the whistleblower's identity.

Speaking on the House floor ahead of a vote to formalize the impeachment investigation, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio,
complained that the process had begun "based on an anonymous whistleblower with no first-hand knowledge who has
a bias against the president, who worked with Vice President Biden."

The fight over the whistleblower's identity is likely to accelerate as Democrats prepare to move forward with public
impeachment hearings. Republicans have already indicated they would seek to try to force the whistleblower to testify
publicly.

U.S. whistleblower laws exist to protect the identities and careers of people who bring forward accusations of wrongdoing
by government officials. Lawmakers in both parties have historically backed those protections.

The Associated Press typically does not reveal the identity of whistleblowers.

In a closed-door hearing Tuesday with Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who handled Ukraine issues at the National Security
Council, Democrats tried to stop Republican attempts to ask questions meant to unmask the whistleblower. Republicans
tried to press Vindman to reveal whom he had discussed the Zelenskiy call with, aiming to call them as witnesses, but
said he would not answer.

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said: "Every time we get close to a witness, close to the whistleblower, we get shut down
in that room. And you have to ask yourself this question: Why? Why does Adam Schiff not want us to ask those questions?"

Schiff is the chairman of House Intelligence Committee.

It was Democrats who first sought to call the whistleblower to testify — but in private and in a classified setting. In late
September, Schiff had promised testimony "very soon." But in recent weeks, Schiff has shifted course and suggested
the testimony was unnecessary because of the accounts already gathered from those more directly involved in the Ukraine
issue.

The allegations in the whistleblower's complaint have been largely supported by a rough transcript of the Zelenskiy call
released by the White House and by congressional testimony from those involved with the administration's Ukraine policy.

Republicans, meanwhile, see a political opportunity in unmasking the official, who the intelligence community's inspector
general said could have "arguable political bias." The inspector general nevertheless found the whistleblower's complaint
to be "credible."

Trump has harshly criticized the whistleblower, saying, "That person's a spy in my opinion," and he has falsely argued the
whistleblower's claims were inaccurate. And while Trump acknowledged whistleblowers should be protected, he added
the caveat "if the whistleblower is legitimate."

In one tweet, Trump asked, "Who is this so-called 'whistleblower' who doesn't know the correct facts. Is he on our Country's
side. Where does he come from."

White House officials nonetheless said they were not involved in efforts to publicly out the whistleblower. But they stressed
that whistleblower protections are aimed at guarding against retaliation, not designed to provide absolute secrecy from
public disclosure.

The whistleblower's attorneys, Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, said they would neither confirm nor deny the person's identity,
saying, "Our client is legally entitled to anonymity."

"Disclosure of the name of any person who may be suspected to be the whistleblower places that individual and their family
in great physical danger," they said. "Any physical harm the individual and/or their family suffers as a result of disclosure
means that the individuals and publications reporting such names will be personally liable for that harm. Such behavior is at
the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless."

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., leader of one of the three committees leading closed-door interviews, echoed the lawyers' concerns,
saying, "I condemn the shameful efforts to identify and harass the whistleblower whose life may be jeopardized for coming
forward to tell the truth."

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: ONCE CIA, ALWAYS CIA:

Postby Slav » Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:35 am

Who shot JFK - Files, Nicoletti,Roselli, Jack Lawrence, Frank Sturgis, Roscoe White, and others
Who shot MLK- police officer Frank Strausser.
Who shot RFK - Thane Caesar
All Cia hired assasins
User avatar
Slav
 
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:08 pm

Re: ONCE CIA, ALWAYS CIA:

Postby Slav » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:45 am

Who shot JFK - Files, Nicoletti,Roselli, Jack Lawrence, Frank Sturgis, Roscoe White, and others
Who shot MLK- police officer Frank Strausser.
Who shot RFK - Thane Caesar
All Cia hired assasins
User avatar
Slav
 
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:08 pm

Re: ONCE CIA, ALWAYS CIA:

Postby Slav » Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:46 am

Who shot JFK - Files, Nicoletti,Roselli, Jack Lawrence, Frank Sturgis, Roscoe White, and others
Who shot MLK- police officer Frank Strausser.
Who shot RFK - Thane Caesar
All Cia hired assasins
User avatar
Slav
 
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:08 pm


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron