DID PRESIDENT TRUMP FINALLY VIEW THE ZAPRUDER FILM ?

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: kenmurray, dankbaar, Bob, Dealey Joe

DID PRESIDENT TRUMP FINALLY VIEW THE ZAPRUDER FILM ?

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Fri Apr 14, 2017 3:14 pm

04.14.2017:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members:

DID PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP FINALLY VIEW THE ORIGINAL, UNCUT BLACK AND WHITE
ZAPRUDER FILM ?

Mr. Tom Jeffers, deceased, was an Excellent JFKMS Forum Member for years, and a
very close, confidential friend of J and B. Tom died a few years ago.

Tom wrote his Theory a few years ago:

"A WHILE AFTER THE INAUGURATION THE NEW PRESIDENT IS TAKEN TO A BASEMENT
VIEWING ROOM AND SHOWN THE ORIGINAL, UNCUT BLACK AND WHITE ZAPRUDER
FILM. THEN ASKED: "ANY QUESTIONS ?"

Tom believed, as many do, that the President is basically a Powerless Bobble Head
Doll, for Rubber Stamping Documents or Agreeing to Orders THAT HE IS TOLD THAT
HE MUST COMPLETE. PERIOD.

A few years ago on one of his Conspiracy Theory Shows, former Minnesota Governor
Jesse Ventura stated that immediately after he was sworn in as Minnesota Governor
he was surrounded by "suits."

Ventura goes on to say that he was escorted to a basement Conference Room, and
seated facing a Horse Shoe Group of 10+ people, some identifying themselves as
CIA, some FBI, and others refusing to identify themselves.

Ventura was asked about his beliefs, how he would govern, his opinions, etc.

IF THIS WAS DONE TO VENTURA, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP ?

Is this a New Trump? Abrupt reversals may reflect experience:

WH Pushes Back on Trump Reversal Reports:

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is abruptly reversing himself on key issues.
And for all his usual bluster, he's startlingly candid about the reason: He's just now really
learning about some of them.

"After listening for 10 minutes, I realized it's not so easy," the president said after a discussion
with Chinese President Xi Jinping that included his hopes that China's pressure could steer
North Korea away from its nuclear efforts.

"I felt pretty strongly that they had a tremendous power" over North Korea, he said in an
interview with The Wall Street Journal. "But it's not what you would think."

That's just one of several recent comments offering insight into what looks like a moderate
makeover for an immoderate president. As he approaches 100 days in office he appears to be
increasingly embracing what he describes as his "flexibility" — acknowledging he may not have
thought deeply about some of the issues he shouted about throughout his political campaign.

Over the past 48 hours, the outsider politician who pledged to upend Washington has:

— Abandoned his vow to label China a currency manipulator.

— Rethought his hands-off assessment of the Syrian conflict — and ordered a missile attack.

— Turned his warm approach toward Vladimir Putin decidedly chilly and declared U.S.-Russia
relations "may
be at an all-time low."

— Decided NATO isn't actually obsolete, as he had claimed.

— Realized the U.S. Export-Import Bank is worth keeping around.

"Instinctively, you would say, 'Isn't that a ridiculous thing,'" he said of the bank he once panned
as "featherbedding" and pledged to eliminate. He now says of the bank, which supports U.S.
exports, "Actually, it's a very good thing. And it actually makes money."

Allies describe Trump as merely growing in the job, taking what he's learning and adapting.
The White House, however, is struggling to explain some of the changes.

Asked about the growing list of reversals on Wednesday, spokesman Sean Spicer argued that
NATO actually is "evolving toward the president's position," not the other way around, by focusing
more on terrorism and encouraging nations to pay more toward defense.

What about flip flops besides NATO ? Spicer was asked.

NATO is actually moving toward Trump, he responded again. Next question.

Trump, who seemed to remain in campaign mode for months after the election, appears to be
listening to different advisers now. His onetime campaign guru, Steve Bannon, has been somewhat
marginalized while moderate voices grow louder.

It may also be that Trump is merely looking for a way to improve his low approval rating, acknowledging
his best tactic could be switching to a less dogmatic, more pragmatic approach.

"Candidates are always bombastic on the campaign trail — and Trump especially. But there is some
growing into the office and dealing with the real effects of some of the policies," said Stephen Moore,
a conservative economist who helped craft Trump's economic plans.

On the other hand, he warned, "if he starts just abandoning his promises, then I think it's going to exact
a political toll."

In many cases, Trump's campaign talk appeared born from instinct and little else. He was known as a candidate
who rarely dug deep, and he employed few policy experts to inform his views. He's also long boasted of his
flexibility, describing his positions as starting points for negotiation — though many of his core ideas, including
frustrations over the U.S. trade imbalance, have held steady for years.

Trump, for instance, vowed to label China a currency manipulator,

"They're not currency manipulators," he conceded in the Wall Street Journal interview, adding that he was
concerned that officially branding them as such could jeopardize his talks with Beijing on confronting North
Korea.

Trump's evolution also reflects changing power dynamics within the White House, including the rise of Gary
Cohn, his economics chief and the former president of Goldman Sachs, and other more moderate business
leaders. Cohn has been looking for ways to fulfill Trump's campaign promises in ways that are practical and
achievable — as opposed to doing things precisely the way the candidate outlined.

That's an attractive prospect for a president eager for the wins he promised — after a difficult first few
months that saw much of his agenda, including his signature travel ban and high-profile attempt at overhauling
health care, blocked by
Congress and the courts.

Trump has also been turning to outside business leaders, including many he's known for years, for guidance.
They include billionaire real estate developers Richard LeFrak and Steven Roth, who are informally advising
him on infrastructure, and billionaire investor Stephen Schwartzman, the chairman and CEO of the Blackstone
Group, who helped organize two major business panels this month to weigh in on possible regulatory and tax
changes.

Trump has also won praise for his decision to bomb an air base in Syria, despite his campaign promise to stay
out ofconflicts in the Middle East. While many in his conservative base were furious about the move, the bombing
after a Syrian chemical weapons attack was widely applauded on the cable networks Trump voraciously consumes.

And it changed the subject from the investigations into Russian interference — and possible collaboration with his
campaign — in the U.S. election.

Some things don't change. Bruce LeVell, a Georgia congressional candidate and Trump campaign backer who met
with him several times this week, said, "We don't want his Twitter to go away. That's his pipeline to supporters, and
he still has it."

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely
yourself about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts,
or writings on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK
Researchers who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Last edited by Bruce Patrick Brychek on Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: DID PRESIDENT TRUMP FINALLY VIEW THE ZAPRUDER FILM ?

Postby JDB4JFK » Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:10 pm

https://youtu.be/Ytv15ono5J0

Here you go Bruce this comedian Bill Hicks who died in 1994 was the first guy I heard mention the story of a President being elected, and than going into a room a watch the real zapruder film. (see above). He did a lot of good stand up on the Kennedy assassination, 911, and the illuminati.
JDB4JFK
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:32 am

Re: DID PRESIDENT TRUMP FINALLY VIEW THE ZAPRUDER FILM ?

Postby Tyler Carpenter » Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:23 pm

I don't believe that this President would be swayed by a viewing of an alternate Z Film. I think all of us and President Trump himself know the time for that sort of action has long once passed. There is no way you could pull off that sort of action on a President today. For success, it would have to be an actual lone nut. At the first sign of conspiracy, the entire operation would be busted. I attribute this to a camera on every corner and in every pocket. Also, I firmly believe the population deep down inside is skeptical of everything they are told by authorities today. If he was to be removed, it would be Via political assassination, which he has already survived several attempts at that. The Russian connections, Pee Pee gate/fake dossier along with other countless ways the MSM tries to slander him each day.

In regards to the so called flip flopping, I believe we need to put the supposed flops into 2 categories:

1. Good Negotiating/Leading from the Front

This category would receive the China currency situation, the Syrian bombing and the Russian issues. China has been told that we will not be taking any more of their crap. They have also been told that they will be helping us in the Asian areas. This would include North Korea and any other potential belligerents in the region. In return, China will still be able to make money and possibly more than ever by having a true close friendly relationship with the USA. I see this as a wonderful opportunity to take the first step towards some semblance of world peace. Look at this last weekend, we had Korean Fat Kids Grampas B-Day and there was all sorts of posturing by them. And what happened, nothing! Kim still needs to go, but when your only trading partner suddenly quits trading, you may begin to see the light. China also wants no part of war with us. They may have a large military population and some advanced weapons, but when have they actually had real world practice in war? I believe they would be caught red handed in a war due to lack of experience. You can read all the books you want, but sometime you have to apply that knowledge. This reminds me of college kids today. Sure you have your engineering degree, but no real world application of those methods learned. To become an effective engineer, you must gain some real world experience where there are many more variables not taught in the classroom.

On Russia, lets be clear, Trump was never cozy or warm to them. He simply was keeping an open mind and hoping for the best. Once Putin proved he was not willing to comply, he was moved to the grey area of Trumps foreign policy, take him or leave him. If you don't want to get on board with our agenda, you will make it hard for yourself to function in this world. Russia is now allied with the bad guys- Syria and Iran.

On Syria, we have all sorts of evidence that Syria did the chemical attack and Russia was complicit. One thing I have begun to learn is that sometimes things are exactly what they seem. We can all go crazy looking for a conspiracy in everything, but sometimes it is what it is. If Trump had not acted in Syria, there would have been 10 times more blowback from the other side. It would have been seen as a sign of him carrying on Obamas do nothing lead from behind policies. And if you noticed, we are not ramping up for a ground war in Syria. Trump will not be dragged into that and it would be a last resort option. He will let Russia and Syria continue to fight ISIS and once they are done, he will come in and mop up. Assad must go and Russia can keep their sea port/base. Vlad will come along once he can see the plan unfold of Trumps operation. With the conspiracy angle or false flag, why aren't Assad and Vlad screaming "I am just a Patsy"? Sure their spokespeople have claimed this, but a leader of a world power would surely be heard if he screamed out Patsy to the world.

2. The second category would be Cost of doing business/ The Swamp thing.

Nato is a powerful presence and would certainly be an important ally in any global conflict. Countries are getting on board and are promising to spend 2% GDP on defence. That is what we have been asking for and with 28 member countries spending that kind of money on essentially warring purposes, you would be stupid to not want to align with them.

The ex-im issue is a direct action from the swamp. I believe so many things are tied together or conflated with the bureaucracy that changing things all at once would be disastrous. This would become apparent to any of us after we have been able to fully grasp all of the cogs that is the Federal Government such as President Trump has. I liken this to the untying of a knot. You need to carefully look at where all of the strings come together and pull them apart in a methodical order to return it to just a straight string. Pull on the wrong piece of the knot and you have made a bigger mess and more work for yourself.
Tyler Carpenter
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:04 pm


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron