Wim=1000 Opposition=0

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: Bob, Phil Dragoo, Dealey Joe, kenmurray, dankbaar

Postby francois bertrand » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:55 pm

William Tell... come on... it's prove Files's story can be exact.... nobody has been able to get him with a lie....
François
User avatar
francois bertrand
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Québec Canada

Postby Paul » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:57 pm

Jim,

Please stop all your negative posts, you didn't even see the program!
I saw it and it was amazing! :D
It proved that what Files said he did (and he was discredited by a lot of people against Wim Dankbaar and against James Files) just could have been done: all he said he'd done backthen behind the picket fence could have been done, that's proven now and also on tape (btw: we already knew that it could be done off course)
This just means that all the critics don't have much against Files anymore to discredit him! :D

Gr. Paul.
Paul
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:55 am

KUDOS TO WIM DANKBAAR AND PETER R. DE VRIES:

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Thu Jun 08, 2006 5:33 pm

Dear Messers. Wim Dankbaar, Perer R. De Vries, and Supporters of the JFK Forum,

Kudos to Wim Dankbaar, and Peter R. De Vries for their outstanding work.
As some of you know, Wim is my very close personal friend. And as some of you also know, Jimmy Files is my closest personal friend for well over 30 years.

Jimmy has never changed the details of any of his discussions with me.
And for the last 12 years I have heard that the Fireball has recoil, it would not be accurate, the shell casing would be too hot, you can't bite it, it was a lousy choice of weapon, etc., etc., etc.

I thank Mark Johannson, Paul, Bob, BobWC, Nick Whalen, and all of the others for their positive comments about Jimmy, Wim, Peter R. De Vries, and what they have accomplished.

What Wim and Peter proved was that everything that Jimmy has said all along was totally accurate, not one exaggeration, not one missed detail,
on things that transpired over 40 years ago.

Further, if they test the Fireball on a drained coconut, filled to my specifications, or a plaster cast of a head, stuffed with the consistency of brain matter, and cotton, dyed red, with Red Indigo Ink, and then test fire the Remington Fireball with Hollow Point Mercury Tips, filled to Wolfman's specifications, then fire at the same distance, with sequential time lapse photography, and you will see the EXACT SAME SPRAY PATTERN THAT COMES FROM JFK'S HEAD IN BOTH THE ZAPRUDER FILM, AND GRODEN'S FILM.

In Martial Arts, and Martial Science in meditation we are taught to "step outside of ourselves, and evaluate objectively what we have accomplished."

TO ALL OF YOU, I SAY STEP OUTSIDE AND TOTALLY EVALUATE WHAT MR. WIM DANKBAAR HAS ACCOMPLISHED, IN TOTALITY, INCLUDING HIS RECENT TEST FIRING OF THE FIREBALL.

Sincerely look at what Wim has amassed, the totality, and the synergy of his total work is nothing less than spectacular.

To those of you loyal to Wim's effort, whether you totally agree with Wim, Jimmy, and myself, or not, I say to you that you are witnessing a true Genius Effort by Mr. Wim Dankbaar, and all those that assist him.

To those who are Really Serious About Their Study Of The JFK Assassination, and all things related thereto, if you are involved in the JFK Forum, then you are at the Right Place, at the Right Time, with the Right People, with the Right Information. There is no other JFK Forum anywhere, in my opinion, that comes close to what Mr. Wim Dankbaar is accomplishing overall.

Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
Last edited by Bruce Patrick Brychek on Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 

Postby Jim Harwood » Thu Jun 08, 2006 5:54 pm

Paul wrote:Jim,

Please stop all your negative posts, you didn't even see the program!
I saw it and it was amazing! :D
It proved that what Files said he did (and he was discredited by a lot of people against Wim Dankbaar and against James Files) just could have been done: all he said he'd done backthen behind the picket fence could have been done, that's proven now and also on tape (btw: we already knew that it could be done off course)
This just means that all the critics don't have much against Files anymore to discredit him! :D

Gr. Paul.


Paul,
Proving that a certain weapon has the capability to" kill" is a far cry from proving that it "did kill". If that is being negative then we ought to outlaw all forms of dissent. Is that not fair? I dont know if Files shot and killed JFK so I dont have any axe to grind. I am just repsonding to the information put forth. You can think it through yourself and decide if this is persuasive evidence of proof of anything other than a gun can be used to shoot a hole in another object. And that is a common accepted fact to begin with. The purpose of a gun is to shoot and strike an intended target.
Thats why courts are required to pin a weapon down as the being the "only" weapon which could have been used in a particular homicide.
With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.
Jim Harwood
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 4:27 pm

Postby Paul » Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:55 pm

Jim Harwood wrote:
Paul wrote:Jim,

Please stop all your negative posts, you didn't even see the program!
I saw it and it was amazing! :D
It proved that what Files said he did (and he was discredited by a lot of people against Wim Dankbaar and against James Files) just could have been done: all he said he'd done backthen behind the picket fence could have been done, that's proven now and also on tape (btw: we already knew that it could be done off course)
This just means that all the critics don't have much against Files anymore to discredit him! :D

Gr. Paul.


Paul,
Proving that a certain weapon has the capability to" kill" is a far cry from proving that it "did kill". If that is being negative then we ought to outlaw all forms of dissent.


Gee man, can't you read???
I did NOT say that it proved James Files killed JFK!
I suggest you read it again!

Gr. Paul.
Paul
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:55 am

Postby Paul » Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:59 pm

Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.


Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.
Paul
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:55 am

Postby Jim Harwood » Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:50 pm

Paul wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.


Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.


So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?
Jim Harwood
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 4:27 pm

PAUL AND JIM HARWOOD:

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:43 pm

Dear Messers. Paul, and Jim Harwood,

I have just reviewed your Responses.

Are you, and others, aware that a Federal Court Action, filed by the late Joe West, who was friends with my friend Jimmy Files, was filed to exhume the "body of JFK." This case was taking shape. Joe also focused on the mercury traces theory. "Insiders" warned that the case must be stopped. Some sources believe that JFK was burried at sea, as was the late JFK, Jr., to avoid their bodies ever being dug up.

"Inside" sources felt Joe West was killed to end the lawsuit. Joe West "died." The lawsuit to exhume JFK'S body "ended." Nobody has ever refiled.

Respectfully,
Bruce Patrick Brychek.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 

Re: Mellon

Postby Johan van Leeuwen » Fri Jun 09, 2006 7:45 am

Jim Harwood wrote:What would the shooting of a mellon accomplish? You could shoot a mellon with a bow and arrow. Would that prove William Tell killed President Kennedy?


:D
Johan van Leeuwen
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:15 pm

Postby Johan van Leeuwen » Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:06 am

Jim Harwood wrote:
Paul wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.


Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.


So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?


James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned.
So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!
Johan van Leeuwen
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:15 pm

Postby Paul » Fri Jun 09, 2006 11:19 am

Johan van Leeuwen wrote:James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned.
So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!


:D

Gr. Paul.
Paul
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:55 am

Postby Jim Harwood » Fri Jun 09, 2006 5:33 pm

Johan van Leeuwen wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:
Paul wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.


Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.


So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?


James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned.
So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!


Are you suggesting that the presence of mercury would confirm James Files as the assassin? I think you'd find any half witted attorney could successfully argue "reasonable doubt".
Jim Harwood
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 4:27 pm

Re: Mellon

Postby Eelco Blaauw » Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:26 am

Jim Harwood wrote:What would the shooting of a mellon accomplish? You could shoot a mellon with a bow and arrow. Would that prove William Tell killed President Kennedy?


Jim, you're not trying to think creative as some of the people on these boards do. Although lot of speculation isn't the answer to all our unsolved problems, focusing on the negative sides of these discoveries doesn't help these members to increase their knowledge in the Kennedy-assassination.

It doesn't matter if they shoot a mellon. They might as well shoot a football, or a coconut, or a target on the wall. The point is: would Files be able to see the things he claims he saw, through the scope AFTER he shot the president with the Fireball?
In order to test this, you must shoot at something with a Fireball and see for yourself. Like: can you see the mellon through the scope AFTER you shot it, despite the heavy recoil? That mellon might as well be something else, like JFK's head. Got it?

Jim Harwood wrote:
Johan van Leeuwen wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:
Paul wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.


Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.


So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?


James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned.
So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!


Are you suggesting that the presence of mercury would confirm James Files as the assassin? I think you'd find any half witted attorney could successfully argue "reasonable doubt".


Why are you speaking of attorneys? Who gives a **** about what happens to James Files. Who cares if he gets conficted, this is not about justice. THAT'S NOT THE POINT.
The point is: if there is mercury in JFK's head, then Files' story is correct. If Files' story is correct, then Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president. If Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president, then the Warren Commission conducted the most incompetent investigation in the history of the United States.

However we or anybody else acts with that info on a legal base is irrelevant, since most of the people involved are already six feet under. What is relevant, is what WE think of that. It's not about Oswald, Files or the Warren Commission. It's about what WE learn about JFK's assassination, and how we make our own thoughts about what America stands for and how America is supposed to 'lead' the world today. The remnants of JFK's assassination are still alive today. That's what's important, and not what happens to James Files!
User avatar
Eelco Blaauw
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Paterswolde, Netherlands

Re: Mellon

Postby Jim Harwood » Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:14 am

Eelco Blaauw wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:What would the shooting of a mellon accomplish? You could shoot a mellon with a bow and arrow. Would that prove William Tell killed President Kennedy?


Jim, you're not trying to think creative as some of the people on these boards do. Although lot of speculation isn't the answer to all our unsolved problems, focusing on the negative sides of these discoveries doesn't help these members to increase their knowledge in the Kennedy-assassination.

It doesn't matter if they shoot a mellon. They might as well shoot a football, or a coconut, or a target on the wall. The point is: would Files be able to see the things he claims he saw, through the scope AFTER he shot the president with the Fireball?
In order to test this, you must shoot at something with a Fireball and see for yourself. Like: can you see the mellon through the scope AFTER you shot it, despite the heavy recoil? That mellon might as well be something else, like JFK's head. Got it?

Jim Harwood wrote:
Johan van Leeuwen wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:
Paul wrote:
Jim Harwood wrote:With the JFK case you dont have the ability to prove even what type of weapon was used in this shooting.

Jim H.


Yes you have: exhume the body and head/skull of JFK.
Mercury lasts for ever and if there are traces of mercury on JFK there's your proof...

Gr. Paul.


So finding traces of Mercury would prove the type of weapon used? Or if there was more than one rifle used?


James Files claims he used a bullet with a special load: mercury. In the LHO explenation, a mercury load is never mentioned.
So if the head of JFK contains mercury, what would that say.... let's think..... does that say anything?... ehhhhh.... I got it! That he ate mercury for breakfast!


Are you suggesting that the presence of mercury would confirm James Files as the assassin? I think you'd find any half witted attorney could successfully argue "reasonable doubt".


Why are you speaking of attorneys? Who gives a **** about what happens to James Files. Who cares if he gets conficted, this is not about justice. THAT'S NOT THE POINT.
The point is: if there is mercury in JFK's head, then Files' story is correct. If Files' story is correct, then Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president. If Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot the president, then the Warren Commission conducted the most incompetent investigation in the history of the United States.

However we or anybody else acts with that info on a legal base is irrelevant, since most of the people involved are already six feet under. What is relevant, is what WE think of that. It's not about Oswald, Files or the Warren Commission. It's about what WE learn about JFK's assassination, and how we make our own thoughts about what America stands for and how America is supposed to 'lead' the world today. The remnants of JFK's assassination are still alive today. That's what's important, and not what happens to James Files!


The presence of mercury in JFK's DNA would not prove that James Files was the shooter. Therefore what are you left with? You are left with the same outcome as before. Conjecture, speculation and wild theories. And I was not concerned with the welfare of James Files I was pointing out that the whole premise is flawed and easily dismissed in a court of law.

That the Warren Commision is a fraud has been known for over forty years now. The conspiracy tales which have grown out the this mess have also proven to be fraudulent. In the case of JFK's murder you have ample proof that the Government "NEVER" investigated the crime. This has led to the proliferation of false conspiracy tales mostly written , promoted and financed by the same group who planned and carried out the assassination. The MEDIA never gets in the way of promoting these wild conspiracy theories in fact they do all they can to create them.

And I am satisfied that I know who and why JFK was murdered. I do not subscribe to the CIA, US Government, Mafia, Texas Oil interest "did it" school of thought. The murder was planned by international interests centered around the British Monarchy and carried out by SOE Louis Mortimer Bloomfield out of Montreal Canada. The organization used to finance the assassination was Permindex. Canada has played a major role in several high profile assassinations in this country including Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King and John F. Kennedy.

You should try and learn more about universal history then you'll have a better understanding of how these kinds of political assasinations come about and just who is behind them.
Jim Harwood
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 4:27 pm

Louis Mortimer Bloomfield

Postby Jim Harwood » Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:50 pm

Leading Montreal lawyer facing fraud charges Harry Bloomfield: Accused of aiding in US$17M 'pump and dump' scheme,
National Post (Canada), October 9, 2002
"A prominent Montreal lawyer and philanthropist, who served on the board of the Business Development Bank of Canada, is on trial in New York on 22 counts of criminal conspiracy. Authorities in the United States allege Harry Bloomfield, 58, helped organize a complex international stock fraud that used dummy offshore companies to bilk unsuspecting investors out of US$17 million ... . A senior partner in the law firm Bloomfield Bellemare, Mr. Bloomfield acts as a director to a number of banks and other companies, including Heller Financial Canada Ltd. and the Vermont Telephone Co. A member of the Progressive Conservative party who ran, unsuccessfully, in the 1980 federal election in the Montreal riding of Mount Royal, he was appointed to the Business Development Bank of Canada in 1987 by then prime minister Brian Mulroney. Mr. Bloomfield was chairman of the BDBC's audit committee from 1987 to 1991 ... . A fixture on Montreal's social circuit, he is renowned for making large public donations on behalf of his family and the charitable foundation that it manages. A number of Canadian public institutions and buildings are named after his family, including a wing of the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and a student centre at St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia. He holds many titles, including Knight of Justice of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem and Queen's Counsel. He is also the former national vice-president of B'Nai Brith Canada, and Canada's current consul general to Liberia, a position formerly held by his late uncle, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield."
Jim Harwood
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 4:27 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron