COULD TIPPET HAVE FIRED THE HEADSSHOT ???

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: Bob, Phil Dragoo, Dealey Joe, kenmurray, dankbaar

COULD TIPPET HAVE FIRED THE HEADSSHOT ???

Postby andre » Mon May 15, 2006 12:37 pm

IF WIM IS RIGHT AND WE HAD A LONG CALL WITH EACH OTHER WE GO A LONG WAY TOGETHER IN THE JFK MATTER IT,S STILL AMAZING THAT IF FILES DID WHAT HE SAID THAT HE IS STIL ALLIVE NORMALY THERE ARE SO CALLED CUT OUTS THAT IS STILL MY DOUBT ABOUT THE MATTER DISPITE SOME SCARY NEW THINGS FILES REPORTED THAT PERHAPS PROOVES THAT HE WAS INVOLVED ? SO IT STILL WOULD SUPRISE ME THAT IF FILES HAS DONE WHAT HE CLAIMS AND I,M STILL NOT SURE ABOUT THAT IT IS AT LEAST STRANGE THAT HE COULD GROW OLD I ADMIT IT IS VERY INTERESTING WHAT HE SAYS BUT MY INSTICNT I CAN NOT CHANGE PERHAPS I HAVE NOT A CLEAR FIEW ANYMORE READING TO MUTCH ABOUT THE MATTER SO MANY POSSIBLITYS WHY WAS TIPPET KILLED AND ACCORDING TO SOME EXPERTS AND WITNESIS NOT BY OSWALD THAT IS FOR ME STILL THE SECOND RIDDLE OF THE CENTURY
WHO SHOT TIPPET AND WHY MY MIND SAY.S OSWALS WAS TELLING THE TRUETH i didn,t schoot anybody sir he says :?:
andre
 

Postby ArjanBoes » Mon May 15, 2006 5:16 pm

Funny,.. I asked Wim the same question in an email this week,....
ArjanBoes
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:58 am

Postby andre » Mon May 15, 2006 7:26 pm

Let me tel you that nobody can answer that question but tippit was not an ordinairie husband or policeman tippit was not killed for presenting oswald as the copkiller and the cinema scene in witsh he was arested why was tippet killed it became a populer question in the70 s in the us
andre
 

Postby Mark Johansson » Tue May 16, 2006 6:31 am

andre wrote:Let me tel you that nobody can answer that question but tippit was not an ordinairie husband or policeman tippit was not killed for presenting oswald as the copkiller and the cinema scene in witsh he was arested why was tippet killed it became a populer question in the70 s in the us


Tippit was in Oak Cliff during that time. There was no possiblity for him to shot Kennedy. Although I think he was heavy involved in the CIA.

Mark
User avatar
Mark Johansson
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:43 am

Postby andre » Tue May 16, 2006 8:32 am

but there have alway,s been doubts about that .the biggest clown of them all the chief dallas police also said tippit wasn,t at the scene at that time.
oswald was not arested fivteen minutes after the shooting it took mutch
longer to find him that makes the story of tippit even more interesting
andre
 

Postby dankbaar » Tue May 16, 2006 10:37 am

ArjanBoes wrote:Funny,.. I asked Wim the same question in an email this week,....




I see a lot of questions. Which one should I answer?



JF – Well, when it comes to giving somebody up, I have never given up anybody in my life. I am not gonna put anybody in prison. And as a matter of fact, you probably couldn’t get the FBI to admit to it, but when a couple of their people forced their way into Stateville, I was offered all kinds of deals and all kinds of agreements, if I would not give an interview on John F. Kennedy before. You know, I told them to do what they gotta do. They did, sorry to my regret, but the thing is this: I’m not gonna give anybody up, I’m not gonna put nobody in prison. I have never went to court and testified against anybody. And I have got a lot of deals offered in my time, I have told them to put me in jail. I went to jail, I’ve had cops tell me this and that. You know, we’re gonna lock you up, we’ve got you dead bang! I’ve had prosecutors come in and tell me: You’re dead coal! Plead guilty!

W – If you would hear that this party that killed officer Tippit is dead, would you have no problem revealing his identity?

JF – You’re asking me a question right now I can’t answer, cause I’m not really sure. Not that it would make any difference probably, if he is dead they couldn’t put him on trial. But what I’m saying is this: I really don’t know how I feel about that, because you know, to me it’s not that relevant, it’s not that important. And as far as I am concerned, I’m not gonna help the FBI or anybody else close their records on a murder case. You know, this is Kennedy we are talking about. You know, to me, I never liked Kennedy, I don’t even know why I ever did it, I don’t even know why the FBI gave Joe West the lead on me. I have never understood that one.

W – But the Tippit killing is related to the murder of Kennedy!

JF – No, the Tippit killing is not related to the murder of Kennedy. If you want to get right down to it. The Tippit killing is related to Oswald. Because Oswald is the one that was supposed to die. Not Tippit. Tippit was just one of those people that stopped the wrong person, that got called into the wrong place. And when he got to ask the wrong party something, and you’ve got an officer in Round Lake Beach by the name of David Ostertag, when he goes out and gives his story, as he talks, he tells people how careful they have to be, these young recruits, cause you never know who you’re stopping. Somebody should have given that talk to J.D. Tippit. Because he stopped the wrong party that got him killed.

J – So the party that killed Tippit though, was actually after …

JF – He was after Lee Harvey Oswald.

J – Okay, make a statement.

JF – Okay. The party that killed J.D. Tippit, he wasn’t there to kill J.D. Tippit. He had parked a little ways from Oswald’s boarding house. They went down there to kill Oswald. They wanted to kill Oswald. They didn’t want to make a big spectacle out of it. They wanted to silence him at that point of the game. Before anybody could get to him. But I guess … I don’t know if Lee got spooked or whatever it was, but then he went to theatre. And he knew who he was going to when he left there, because he was supposed to meet the controller there. Which is David Atlee Phillips. He was the one that was supposed to be at the theatre as far as I understand.

W – How do you know?

JF – Because I knew that’s where he was supposed to be. I knew that Lee Harvey Oswald was going to go meet him …aah ..

J – Start over! It was my understanding that he was meeting his handler …

JF – It was my understanding that Lee Harvey Oswald when this was over with, that he was going to be in contact with David Atlee Phillips. I did not know that David Phillips was going to be at the theatre, but I knew Oswald was going to go meet him. …….. Let me start over again, I’m lost now!

W- It was my understanding ….

JF - My understanding was that Lee, that he was gonna meet his controller, which is David Phillips, who was my controller. He was gonna meet him. I didn’t know it was gonna be at the theatre. I have no knowledge of that at that point. But if Lee Harvey Oswald ran to a theatre, that had to be where the meeting was going to take place. Lee must have left his house earlier or for whatever reason, I don’t really know, but the party that went there, didn’t find Lee there. And when he started to leave, he was stopped by the police. This is when he shot Tippit. What transpired there I can’t tell you, who saw this guy there, I can’t tell you whether he ran, I can’t tell you whether he walked, I don’t know. All I understand is this: A party that I know, that had come by my motelroom, told me he had to burn a cop. The cop he burned was J.D. Tippit. That was the only cop killed in Dallas that day, it had to be the one that he burned. At this point he says: “Here, do you want to get rid of that? “ I said: “ Hell no, you take care and get rid of your own weapon! I’ve got my own problems, Get out of here. Go! “
User avatar
dankbaar
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1473
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:27 pm

COULD TIPPET HAVE FIRED THE HEAD SHOT ?

Postby Bruce Patrick Brychek » Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:46 pm

Thursday
06.27.2019
11:46 a.m.,
Chicago, Illinois time:

Dear JFK Murder Solved Forum Members and Readers:

05.15.2006 - Andres Posted this Inquisitive Headline and personal commentary.

Within his short diatribe Andres posits again, as many others have previously, Why Is James Earl
Sutton-Files Not Dead ?

The simple answer is That He Is Not Dead.

The Additional Obvious Answer that J has alluded to for decades is that both J and Chuck
Nicoletti never talked again to others about their involvement in The Removal of JFK on
11.22.1963 at 12:30 p.m., Dallas, Texas time in Dealey Plaza.

IN POINT OF FACT AND ACTUAL FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE, ONLY TWO (2) PEOPLE KNEW WITH
ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY ON 11.22.1963 AFTER 12:30 P.M., DALLAS, TEXAS TIME, IN DALLAS,
TEXAS, DEALEY PLAZA, WHAT TWO (2) MEN FIRED ACTUAL KILL SHOTS IN THE REMOVAL OF
JFK: J and CHUCK.

The First Open Disclosure of J's Involvement in The Removal of JFK came through the FBI decades
later.

By then the waters had been muddied over sufficiently that an ever lessening amount of absolute
proof, evidence, interest, and possible valid testimony had dissipated for a variety of reasons.

Being totally facetious for a moment.

1. JFK is still dead.

2. J is still alive.

3. J shot JFK exactly as his interviews have indicated for decades.

So what today, almost 56 years later ! What is known about The Total Plot and Players with exacting
proof, Top Down ?

4. J did not shoot JFK as his interviews have indicated for decades.

So what today, almost 56 years later ! What is known about The Total Plot and Players with exacting
proof, Top Down ?

As always, I strongly recommend that you first read, research, and study material completely yourself
about a Subject Matter, and then formulate your own Opinions and Theories.

Any additional analyses, interviews, investigations, readings, research, studies, thoughts, or writings
on any aspect of this Subject Matter ?

Bear in mind that we are trying to attract and educate a Whole New Generation of JFK Researchers
who may not be as well versed as you.

Comments ?

Respectfully,
BB.
Bruce Patrick Brychek
 
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am


Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron