Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Knowing the truth about the Kennedy Assassination is understanding America today.

Moderators: kenmurray, dankbaar, Bob, Dealey Joe

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby saracarter766 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:28 pm

my husband has said the same thing that you said bob. :mrgreen:
saracarter766
 

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby Pasquale DiFabrizio » Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:05 am

Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.


Jsnow915,
I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here.
Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.
What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO :lol:
Pasquale DiFabrizio
"Think with your dipstick, Jimmy!!!"
User avatar
Pasquale DiFabrizio
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:48 am
Location: United States

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby katisha » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:24 am

Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.


I'd be interested to hear what he has to say, Jsnow915, and good on you for contactng him.

I do, however, find it hard to believe that Gary Mack accepts the SBT and the Warren Report as hard evidence for the Lone Nutter, yet won't accept that there is any hard evidence of a conspiracy, in spite of the hundreds of books and documents out there. Some of them may be a bit off the mark :lol: but there are also many well-documented resources.
There are no heroes in this piece, only men who collaborated actively or passively - willfully or self-deludedly - in dirty work that does violence to the elementary concept of justice and affronts normal intelligence.

Sylvia Meagher, 1967, on the WC
katisha
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:18 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby saracarter766 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:38 am

ChristophMessner wrote:
saracarter766 wrote:Bob i love how you tell it straight up. :mrgreen:
I like your way of telling straight up, too, Sara, whether you believe it or not.



you know what your right to i don't believe you and sorry chris but i no longer can trust you or feel like i can trust you and that is all i'm saying. however it was very nice of you to say but chris you totally destroyed the trust i had in you. :cry:



i give the middle finger to traitors like gary mack i just have a very extreme amount of hatred for him i just can't help it peeps but when i look up to and highly respect and admire people like gary mack and they end up turning the other way yes i am very angry at him for that i can't help it people. :mrgreen:
saracarter766
 

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby ChristophMessner » Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:29 am

saracarter766 wrote: you know what your right to i don't believe you and sorry chris but i no longer can trust you or feel like i can trust you and that is all i'm saying. however it was very nice of you to say but chris you totally destroyed the trust i had in you. :cry:
It's because you judge people superficially and throw around verdicts like God. :(
saracarter766 wrote: i give the middle finger to traitors like gary mack i just have a very extreme amount of hatred for him i just can't help it peeps but when i look up to and highly respect and admire people like gary mack and they end up turning the other way yes i am very angry at him for that i can't help it people. :mrgreen:
I feel the same almost (rather contempt than hatred), but rather think that pissing at his shinbone all the time is not the right and decent strategy to bring him back to the unbiased truthers (which he was in the beginning). It would be important to help him increasing his courage and taking his momentary face-and-money-losing (which would soon disappear I'm sure) for his change into promoting publicly what he REALLY believes in the JFK-case again.
unjust peace is better than unjust war; just war is better than unjust peace; just peace is better than just war
User avatar
ChristophMessner
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:11 am
Location: Germany

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby kenmurray » Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:44 pm

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:
Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.


Jsnow915,
I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here.
Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.
What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO :lol:

Pasquale, I dont think Mack will ever post here. Heck he doesn't in other forums. He hides and sends people messages :lol:
kenmurray
 
Posts: 5116
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby Bob » Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:57 pm

kenmurray wrote:
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:
Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.


Jsnow915,
I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here.
Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.
What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO :lol:

Pasquale, I dont think Mack will ever post here. Heck he doesn't in other forums. He hides and sends people messages :lol:


Ironically, Gary signed up as a forum member awhile back. I'm sure he drops in on occasion to check out the discussion. But as Ken says, Mack does most of communicating one on one with people, unless he gets the opportunity to appear on a Discovery special about the JFK assassination as an "expert", or some other MSM investigative "report" that uses Mack as the mouthpiece to help spread the disinformation message.
User avatar
Bob
 
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Florida/Wisconsin

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby saracarter766 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:02 pm

ChristophMessner wrote:
saracarter766 wrote: you know what your right to i don't believe you and sorry chris but i no longer can trust you or feel like i can trust you and that is all i'm saying. however it was very nice of you to say but chris you totally destroyed the trust i had in you. :cry:
It's because you judge people superficially and throw around verdicts like God. :(
saracarter766 wrote: i give the middle finger to traitors like gary mack i just have a very extreme amount of hatred for him i just can't help it peeps but when i look up to and highly respect and admire people like gary mack and they end up turning the other way yes i am very angry at him for that i can't help it people. :mrgreen:
I feel the same almost (rather contempt than hatred), but rather think that pissing at his shinbone all the time is not the right and decent strategy to bring him back to the unbiased truthers (which he was in the beginning). It would be important to help him increasing his courage and taking his momentary face-and-money-losing (which would soon disappear I'm sure) for his change into promoting publicly what he REALLY believes in the JFK-case again.



well well chris showing your true colors again do me a huge favor and never speak to me again i am fed up to here with you there might have been some chance that i would've wanted us to be friends with you again aw man you can forget it i always knew i could'nt trust you so go talk to your new pal paul pennyworth he'll give a flying frick what you got to say. :evil:

i don't think things are gonna get any better between me and chris guys i'm gonna just leave there's to much bad blood between me and chris i wish everyone the best.

with that being said i'm outta here peeps :cry:


and chris you take that olive branch you've been trying to extend and you shove it where the sun don't shine because when i told you i hated your guts i dang sure meant it. :evil:
saracarter766
 

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby Bob » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:55 pm

I've said all that I can say. I've tried to be a ref in all of this, which is ironically what I tried to do as a bouncer in an earlier time in my life. People still ask me about all the fights I was in as a bouncer. Yes...I was in a few...but I broke up a hell of a lot more fights than I was ever involved in. That being said...shake hands...and DON'T come out fighting.
User avatar
Bob
 
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Florida/Wisconsin

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby ChristophMessner » Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:32 pm

Jesus said: "Love your enemies!"

So Gary Mack shall be critizised but not ruled by mob's law.
unjust peace is better than unjust war; just war is better than unjust peace; just peace is better than just war
User avatar
ChristophMessner
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:11 am
Location: Germany

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby Pasquale DiFabrizio » Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:48 am

kenmurray wrote:
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:
Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.


Jsnow915,
I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here.
Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.
What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO :lol:

Pasquale, I dont think Mack will ever post here. Heck he doesn't in other forums. He hides and sends people messages :lol:


Well, it must be a real pickle that he's in, eh? I mean, here he is putting out propaganda and disinformation and, like a politician, doing a dance individually or one-on-one with people and trying to dupe them. Here we are calling him Mack-the-Sack, and he has to respond by proxy! LOL
I hope he's reading this: What is "hard evidence," and why, Mr. Mack, do you think there is no "hard evidence" of a conspiracy?
Pasquale DiFabrizio
"Think with your dipstick, Jimmy!!!"
User avatar
Pasquale DiFabrizio
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:48 am
Location: United States

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby ChristophMessner » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:16 am

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: What is "hard evidence," and why, Mr. Mack, do you think there is no "hard evidence" of a conspiracy?
This is a good non-insulting question, Pasquale. Getting emotional would be the pre-democratic, the barbaric, the mob's communication culture.
unjust peace is better than unjust war; just war is better than unjust peace; just peace is better than just war
User avatar
ChristophMessner
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:11 am
Location: Germany

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby Pasquale DiFabrizio » Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:36 am

ChristophMessner wrote:
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: What is "hard evidence," and why, Mr. Mack, do you think there is no "hard evidence" of a conspiracy?
This is a good non-insulting question, Pasquale. Getting emotional would be the pre-democratic, the barbaric, the mob's communication culture.


Exactly.
Wait, does that mean I shouldn't call him Mack the Sack? :D
Pasquale DiFabrizio
"Think with your dipstick, Jimmy!!!"
User avatar
Pasquale DiFabrizio
 
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:48 am
Location: United States

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby kenmurray » Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:59 pm

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:
ChristophMessner wrote:
Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote: What is "hard evidence," and why, Mr. Mack, do you think there is no "hard evidence" of a conspiracy?
This is a good non-insulting question, Pasquale. Getting emotional would be the pre-democratic, the barbaric, the mob's communication culture.


Exactly.
Wait, does that mean I shouldn't call him Mack the Sack? :D

Pasquale, yes you can. There is plenty of "hard evidence" that Gary is "Mack The Sack" :lol:
kenmurray
 
Posts: 5116
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Postby Bob » Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:26 pm

Mack said one thing in 1988 on TMWKK. Now he says a lot of other things. Privately, he says that he thinks there could be a conspiracy depending on who he is talking to, but publically (like in the Discovery specials on the JFK assassination) and as curator of the 6th floor museum at the TSBD, he is a big proponent of the magic bullet theory and that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin. Mack deserves all the criticism he gets, not just for flip flopping, but because he still talks about the SBT or MBT like it was a reality, when he know FULL well that it isn't. Mack is a smart guy and well spoken. Somebody got to him. When you see me posting things that are similar to Mack's beliefs or not posting at all, you will know somebody got to me.
User avatar
Bob
 
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Florida/Wisconsin

PreviousNext

Return to Who shot JFK, and why?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron